Comments on: Best Extended Scope Rail for AR https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2007/04/best-extended-scope-rail-for-ar/ from AccurateShooter.com Fri, 15 May 2026 20:57:20 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26 By: Brett https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2007/04/best-extended-scope-rail-for-ar/comment-page-1/#comment-39 Wed, 04 Apr 2007 05:48:46 +0000 http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/2007/04/02/best-extended-scope-rail-for-ar/#comment-39 White Oak Precison has a nice one with 15minutes elevation machined in. http://www.whiteoakarmament.com/

]]> By: Robert Whitley https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2007/04/best-extended-scope-rail-for-ar/comment-page-1/#comment-38 Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:55:41 +0000 http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/2007/04/02/best-extended-scope-rail-for-ar/#comment-38 I don’t know what the technical specs are on the RRA rail, but the rail needs to come forward at least 3″ forward of the receiver to get enought eye relief for scopes like a Leupold or Nightforce that have a long eye relief, and the GG&G rail does this.

Robert Whitley

]]> By: Steve https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2007/04/best-extended-scope-rail-for-ar/comment-page-1/#comment-37 Mon, 02 Apr 2007 22:10:45 +0000 http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/2007/04/02/best-extended-scope-rail-for-ar/#comment-37 I’m curious how this compares to the one from RRA: http://www.rockriverarms.com/item-detail.cfm?ID=AR0134&storeid=1&image=rrscout.gif&CFID=37891641&CFTOKEN=29164536

What would make one better than the other? The RRA model doesn’t have rail all the way to the rear, but I’m not sure that’s a negative.

]]>