<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Barnard Tactical/XC Rifle</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2007/09/new-barnard-rifle-for-tactical-and-x-course-use/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2007/09/new-barnard-rifle-for-tactical-and-x-course-use/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 00:54:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ronf</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2007/09/new-barnard-rifle-for-tactical-and-x-course-use/comment-page-1/#comment-8324</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ronf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 20:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/2007/09/17/new-barnard-rifle-for-tactical-and-x-course-use/#comment-8324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the cheek rest is too far back]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the cheek rest is too far back</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrisj</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2007/09/new-barnard-rifle-for-tactical-and-x-course-use/comment-page-1/#comment-391</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chrisj]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 19:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/2007/09/17/new-barnard-rifle-for-tactical-and-x-course-use/#comment-391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How do you know it falls short of the T2k? Do you own either? Have you fired both and compared? Please tell us in what ways it falls short.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you know it falls short of the T2k? Do you own either? Have you fired both and compared? Please tell us in what ways it falls short.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aubrey Sonnenberg</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2007/09/new-barnard-rifle-for-tactical-and-x-course-use/comment-page-1/#comment-390</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aubrey Sonnenberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 02:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/2007/09/17/new-barnard-rifle-for-tactical-and-x-course-use/#comment-390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s a better attempt than the RPA, but still falls far short of the features and fit of a T2k.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a better attempt than the RPA, but still falls far short of the features and fit of a T2k.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
