<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Slick Single-Shot Surgeon for the Boss&#039;s Daughter</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2007/10/slick-single-shot-surgeon-for-the-bosss-daughter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2007/10/slick-single-shot-surgeon-for-the-bosss-daughter/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 11:38:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trond Berg</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2007/10/slick-single-shot-surgeon-for-the-bosss-daughter/comment-page-1/#comment-1073</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trond Berg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 03:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/2007/10/23/slick-single-shot-surgeon-for-the-bosss-daughter/#comment-1073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I aggree, i was looking at the work on the rifle and then i was thinking to myself, what a shame that they put this ugly acessories on, sure a good gunsmith would be able to deliver somthing more pleasing to th eye without jepordising any accuracy on the rig,,,, but atleast she&#039;s smiling everytime she put her dad to shame.....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I aggree, i was looking at the work on the rifle and then i was thinking to myself, what a shame that they put this ugly acessories on, sure a good gunsmith would be able to deliver somthing more pleasing to th eye without jepordising any accuracy on the rig,,,, but atleast she&#8217;s smiling everytime she put her dad to shame&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KLENCHBLAIZE</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2007/10/slick-single-shot-surgeon-for-the-bosss-daughter/comment-page-1/#comment-461</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KLENCHBLAIZE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 19:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/2007/10/23/slick-single-shot-surgeon-for-the-bosss-daughter/#comment-461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A lovely piece of kit until the rings and mount hit the retina!  Just look at how they sit there without any attempt to ‘unite’ the two with the rifle’s action.  Yes, I know this is a bench gun, and those horribly aggressive nuts are there to ensure the rings are torqued-down to some brutish setting on the similarly agricultural rail, but I remain convinced you can achieve the same desired level of security but with an atheistic that compliments the attention to detail evident elsewhere, and still ensure the return-to- zero after recoil that is needed in what is, actually, a calibre of little recoil if my 25X47 Swiss Match is anything to go by.

Sorry if my observations are unwelcome, and yes I’m mindful most bench guns use the same ring &amp; base type, but as someone who’s commissioned a custom-built rifle I know you can achieve something far more pleasing to the eye without compromise to accuracy, and by having Conetrol stainless steel bases machined in such a way as to meld them into the action at a fraction of the cost of the rifle engraving, and then girding the scope in George V. Miller’s finest matching “projectionless” 30mm rings.

Clearly the good news is this is still something that can be achieved and, perhaps, as a certain person’s next birthday present??!!

Cheers

Klenchblaize]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lovely piece of kit until the rings and mount hit the retina!  Just look at how they sit there without any attempt to ‘unite’ the two with the rifle’s action.  Yes, I know this is a bench gun, and those horribly aggressive nuts are there to ensure the rings are torqued-down to some brutish setting on the similarly agricultural rail, but I remain convinced you can achieve the same desired level of security but with an atheistic that compliments the attention to detail evident elsewhere, and still ensure the return-to- zero after recoil that is needed in what is, actually, a calibre of little recoil if my 25X47 Swiss Match is anything to go by.</p>
<p>Sorry if my observations are unwelcome, and yes I’m mindful most bench guns use the same ring &amp; base type, but as someone who’s commissioned a custom-built rifle I know you can achieve something far more pleasing to the eye without compromise to accuracy, and by having Conetrol stainless steel bases machined in such a way as to meld them into the action at a fraction of the cost of the rifle engraving, and then girding the scope in George V. Miller’s finest matching “projectionless” 30mm rings.</p>
<p>Clearly the good news is this is still something that can be achieved and, perhaps, as a certain person’s next birthday present??!!</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Klenchblaize</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
