<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &quot;243 BR-K&quot; (6BR Long) Wildcat Delivers 3450 fps with 95gr VLDs</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2007/11/6br-long-successful-243-wildcat-from-california/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2007/11/6br-long-successful-243-wildcat-from-california/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 10:05:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2007/11/6br-long-successful-243-wildcat-from-california/comment-page-1/#comment-4329</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 22:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/2007/11/16/6br-long-successful-243-wildcat-from-california/#comment-4329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What would be the expected barrel life???]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What would be the expected barrel life???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dazz 93</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2007/11/6br-long-successful-243-wildcat-from-california/comment-page-1/#comment-514</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dazz 93]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 08:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/2007/11/16/6br-long-successful-243-wildcat-from-california/#comment-514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does anyone out there have ballistics/load data for the .243BR-K]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone out there have ballistics/load data for the .243BR-K</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boyd Allen</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2007/11/6br-long-successful-243-wildcat-from-california/comment-page-1/#comment-515</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boyd Allen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 15:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/2007/11/16/6br-long-successful-243-wildcat-from-california/#comment-515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think that this design is an excellent piece of work. A couple of things that I noticed on the drawing were of interest to me. First of all, there is .001 taper in the neck. This is a good idea for a no-turn situation that is often overlooked, given that the unturned neck is itself tapered. I wonder what the water capacity of the case is.

EDITOR&#039;s NOTE: Boyd, the taper is something I placed in the mock-up drawing because we&#039;ve found that to be useful with no-turn necks. However, the original reamer print from which I was working was for a .262 no-turn neck and that drawing does not include a taper, nor does the 22 BR-K reamer print. It is important that people understand this is just a &quot;rendering&quot; produced with Quick-Design software. For actual chamber specs, consult with Dave Kiff at Pacific Tool. Quick-Design software makes certain &quot;assumptions&quot; about case design that may differ from the actual reamer drawings.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that this design is an excellent piece of work. A couple of things that I noticed on the drawing were of interest to me. First of all, there is .001 taper in the neck. This is a good idea for a no-turn situation that is often overlooked, given that the unturned neck is itself tapered. I wonder what the water capacity of the case is.</p>
<p>EDITOR&#8217;s NOTE: Boyd, the taper is something I placed in the mock-up drawing because we&#8217;ve found that to be useful with no-turn necks. However, the original reamer print from which I was working was for a .262 no-turn neck and that drawing does not include a taper, nor does the 22 BR-K reamer print. It is important that people understand this is just a &#8220;rendering&#8221; produced with Quick-Design software. For actual chamber specs, consult with Dave Kiff at Pacific Tool. Quick-Design software makes certain &#8220;assumptions&#8221; about case design that may differ from the actual reamer drawings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
