Comments on: Tell Santa to Wait — New Scopes from Sightron https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2007/12/tell-santa-to-wait-new-scopes-from-sightron/ from AccurateShooter.com Wed, 15 Apr 2026 14:06:46 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26 By: Jeff Campbell https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2007/12/tell-santa-to-wait-new-scopes-from-sightron/comment-page-1/#comment-624 Sun, 23 Dec 2007 14:21:52 +0000 http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/2007/12/22/tell-santa-to-wait-new-scopes-from-sightron/#comment-624 To me a 800.00 dollar scope needs to be right. Leupolds are not,I will never own another one again. I just wished someone would have told me about the scope lash problem. You should not have refocus every time you pull the trigger. Thats total B.S. on a 850.00 scope. Had the money to buy a Nightforce and did not. All the tests I read said good glass, they past the square shoot test and track straight. But they have scope lash problems all of them that are side focus. My advice would be save another 400.00 and go with Nightforce. DO NOT spend 850.00 on an unknown.

]]> By: rhino https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2007/12/tell-santa-to-wait-new-scopes-from-sightron/comment-page-1/#comment-625 Sat, 22 Dec 2007 23:37:06 +0000 http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/2007/12/22/tell-santa-to-wait-new-scopes-from-sightron/#comment-625 I agree for F-class you could use a smaller dot :)

]]> By: Monte Milanuk https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2007/12/tell-santa-to-wait-new-scopes-from-sightron/comment-page-1/#comment-626 Sat, 22 Dec 2007 20:38:56 +0000 http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/2007/12/22/tell-santa-to-wait-new-scopes-from-sightron/#comment-626 An 1/8 minute dot reticle might be a better choice… sounds like it would make a reasonably good option for a scope for an F-Class gun, but a 1/4 minute dot would look awful big against the current LRFC target.

Monte: You’re right, and I mentioned the same thing to the Sightron guys.

]]>