<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: D.C. v. Heller Ruling &#8212; The Aftermath</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2008/06/dc-v-heller-ruling-what-does-it-mean/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2008/06/dc-v-heller-ruling-what-does-it-mean/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 17:43:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2008/06/dc-v-heller-ruling-what-does-it-mean/comment-page-1/#comment-1382</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 18:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=1079#comment-1382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This should be a call to arms for gun owners regarding nominees for the supreme court.  The next time the Democrats play &quot;keep away&quot; with originalist nominees by threatening a phony filibuster, we should demand the conservatives (what&#039;s left of them) to call their bluff.  By the same token, if the Democrats nominate another Ruth Bader Ginsburg flaming liberal type, we should encourage the conservatives to stage a real filibuster to stop them.  Think about it, we gun owners dodged a bullet by one vote (5 to 4) this time.  Next time, and there will be a next time, we could just as easily take a bullet by one vote.  We turned back &quot;Comprehensive Immigration&quot; ie: amnesty for illegals, we can do it, again, to protect our gun rights.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This should be a call to arms for gun owners regarding nominees for the supreme court.  The next time the Democrats play &#8220;keep away&#8221; with originalist nominees by threatening a phony filibuster, we should demand the conservatives (what&#8217;s left of them) to call their bluff.  By the same token, if the Democrats nominate another Ruth Bader Ginsburg flaming liberal type, we should encourage the conservatives to stage a real filibuster to stop them.  Think about it, we gun owners dodged a bullet by one vote (5 to 4) this time.  Next time, and there will be a next time, we could just as easily take a bullet by one vote.  We turned back &#8220;Comprehensive Immigration&#8221; ie: amnesty for illegals, we can do it, again, to protect our gun rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2008/06/dc-v-heller-ruling-what-does-it-mean/comment-page-1/#comment-1381</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 17:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=1079#comment-1381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This should be a call to arms for gun owners regarding nominees for the supreme court.  The next time the Democrats play &quot;keep away&quot; with originalist nominees by threatening a phony filibuster, we should demand the conservatives (what&#039;s left of them) to call their bluff.  By the same token, if the Democrats nominate another Ruth Bader Ginsburg flaming liberal type, we should encourage the conservatives to stage a real filibuster to stop them.  Think about it, we gun owners dodged a bullet by one vote (5 to 4) this time.  Next time, and there will be a next time, we could just as easily take a bullet by one vote.  We turned back &quot;Comprehensive Immagration&quot; ie: amnesty for illegals, we can do it, again, to protect our gun rights.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This should be a call to arms for gun owners regarding nominees for the supreme court.  The next time the Democrats play &#8220;keep away&#8221; with originalist nominees by threatening a phony filibuster, we should demand the conservatives (what&#8217;s left of them) to call their bluff.  By the same token, if the Democrats nominate another Ruth Bader Ginsburg flaming liberal type, we should encourage the conservatives to stage a real filibuster to stop them.  Think about it, we gun owners dodged a bullet by one vote (5 to 4) this time.  Next time, and there will be a next time, we could just as easily take a bullet by one vote.  We turned back &#8220;Comprehensive Immagration&#8221; ie: amnesty for illegals, we can do it, again, to protect our gun rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2008/06/dc-v-heller-ruling-what-does-it-mean/comment-page-1/#comment-1380</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 23:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=1079#comment-1380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is also the part about trigger locks. The ruling found a requirement for firearms to be stored with locks to be unconstitutional. For example page 2, &quot; 3. The handgun ban and the trigger-lock requirement (as applied to self-defense) violate the Second Amendment. &quot; I found this interesting and expect it to affect other states, such as MA, which has a locked storage requirement.

Oh, since this is the only comment, allow me to add, Justice Scalia Rocks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is also the part about trigger locks. The ruling found a requirement for firearms to be stored with locks to be unconstitutional. For example page 2, &#8221; 3. The handgun ban and the trigger-lock requirement (as applied to self-defense) violate the Second Amendment. &#8221; I found this interesting and expect it to affect other states, such as MA, which has a locked storage requirement.</p>
<p>Oh, since this is the only comment, allow me to add, Justice Scalia Rocks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
