<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 6XC Brass Dimensions and Capacities</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2008/07/6xc-brass-dimensions-and-capacities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2008/07/6xc-brass-dimensions-and-capacities/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 15:38:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenn Burdick</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2008/07/6xc-brass-dimensions-and-capacities/comment-page-1/#comment-55914</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kenn Burdick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 16:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=1221#comment-55914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I see talk here of RL17 for the 6XC, and I have to wonder why not RL16?  RL16 is temperature stable, RL17 is not, and RL16 gives almost a 100 fps boost over H4350 at almost exact same pressures, and with the same powder measurement. Seems to me that Alliant hit it out of the park with RL16.  It&#039;s wonderful in my 6.5 Creedmoor, highly accurate, no temperature issues, and should give similar results with the 6XC.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see talk here of RL17 for the 6XC, and I have to wonder why not RL16?  RL16 is temperature stable, RL17 is not, and RL16 gives almost a 100 fps boost over H4350 at almost exact same pressures, and with the same powder measurement. Seems to me that Alliant hit it out of the park with RL16.  It&#8217;s wonderful in my 6.5 Creedmoor, highly accurate, no temperature issues, and should give similar results with the 6XC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SPClark</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2008/07/6xc-brass-dimensions-and-capacities/comment-page-1/#comment-1424</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SPClark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 20:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=1221#comment-1424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[German, I have a bunch of unfired G1 brass; if you want some just let me know how many!

Just finished the RL17 report too &amp; that looks very promising. As RCW3 brought up, there doesn&#039;t appear to be any available in the US (I&#039;d be ordering 5 lbs if there were!) so we&#039;ll all be interested to see if later batches are equal to that which you&#039;ve tested. Time will tell....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>German, I have a bunch of unfired G1 brass; if you want some just let me know how many!</p>
<p>Just finished the RL17 report too &amp; that looks very promising. As RCW3 brought up, there doesn&#8217;t appear to be any available in the US (I&#8217;d be ordering 5 lbs if there were!) so we&#8217;ll all be interested to see if later batches are equal to that which you&#8217;ve tested. Time will tell&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: German Salazar</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2008/07/6xc-brass-dimensions-and-capacities/comment-page-1/#comment-1423</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[German Salazar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 22:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=1221#comment-1423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve, thanks for adding that data, I don&#039;t have any Gen. 1 Tubb brass, so I appreciate knowing the numbers.

Watch for a very interesting article right here about Alliant&#039;s new Reloder 17 in the 6XC and .308, I just finished it and it should be online shortly.
German]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, thanks for adding that data, I don&#8217;t have any Gen. 1 Tubb brass, so I appreciate knowing the numbers.</p>
<p>Watch for a very interesting article right here about Alliant&#8217;s new Reloder 17 in the 6XC and .308, I just finished it and it should be online shortly.<br />
German</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Clark</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2008/07/6xc-brass-dimensions-and-capacities/comment-page-1/#comment-1422</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Clark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 20:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=1221#comment-1422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks German for the updated info!

From those numbers it&#039;s plain the G1 Tubb brass was marginal; 170.4 grains weight, 47.3 grains water capacity from my results back in 2005.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks German for the updated info!</p>
<p>From those numbers it&#8217;s plain the G1 Tubb brass was marginal; 170.4 grains weight, 47.3 grains water capacity from my results back in 2005.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
