<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reloder 17 Delivers Stunning Velocities in First Tests</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2008/07/reloder-17-delivers-impressive-velocities-in-first-tests/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2008/07/reloder-17-delivers-impressive-velocities-in-first-tests/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 15:50:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Whitley</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2008/07/reloder-17-delivers-impressive-velocities-in-first-tests/comment-page-1/#comment-1425</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Whitley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 20:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=1249#comment-1425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It will be interesting to see if the later lots of RL-17 continue to have as much punch as the initial lot imported into this country.  Right now there does not seem to be a pound of it to be purchased anywhere in the US.  That&#039;s a very substantial bit of extra performance, and the question in my mind is whether the manufacturer can produce the same type of performance consistently lot to lot (or whether that&#039;s a &quot;one in a million&quot; lot that first came in to the US).  We&#039;ll see!

Thanks German for all your work and reporting on this - Great Job!

If they can do this repeatedly with RL-17, then what would be possible with a Nitrochemie powder like that in the RL-15 burn rate for cartridges like the 6BR, 6mmAR, 6mmAR Turbo, etc.?   200 fps more with a 105 gr bullet in those cartridges would be a real &quot;WOW&quot;!

Robert Whitley]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be interesting to see if the later lots of RL-17 continue to have as much punch as the initial lot imported into this country.  Right now there does not seem to be a pound of it to be purchased anywhere in the US.  That&#8217;s a very substantial bit of extra performance, and the question in my mind is whether the manufacturer can produce the same type of performance consistently lot to lot (or whether that&#8217;s a &#8220;one in a million&#8221; lot that first came in to the US).  We&#8217;ll see!</p>
<p>Thanks German for all your work and reporting on this &#8211; Great Job!</p>
<p>If they can do this repeatedly with RL-17, then what would be possible with a Nitrochemie powder like that in the RL-15 burn rate for cartridges like the 6BR, 6mmAR, 6mmAR Turbo, etc.?   200 fps more with a 105 gr bullet in those cartridges would be a real &#8220;WOW&#8221;!</p>
<p>Robert Whitley</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
