<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ten Commandments for Electronic Scales</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2008/08/ten-commandments-for-electronic-scales/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2008/08/ten-commandments-for-electronic-scales/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 15:50:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2008/08/ten-commandments-for-electronic-scales/comment-page-1/#comment-1488</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 03:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=1872#comment-1488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got some very good tips from this article that I will do. One thing that has helped my scale is a 4&quot; x 6&quot; piece of 3/4&quot; thick polished granite that I set it on. I got it from a granite shop that makes counter tops from real granite.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got some very good tips from this article that I will do. One thing that has helped my scale is a 4&#8243; x 6&#8243; piece of 3/4&#8243; thick polished granite that I set it on. I got it from a granite shop that makes counter tops from real granite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Parker</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2008/08/ten-commandments-for-electronic-scales/comment-page-1/#comment-1487</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Parker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 04:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=1872#comment-1487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Editor: Scott Parker commented that, given the promised resolution of laboratory-grade scales: &quot;Someone, somewhere, will eventually use one of these damned things to start sorting powder by kernel weight and blow their gun apart.&quot;

Editor: What Scott means, I think, is that individual grains of powder are not all exactly the same in weight or shape. The predicted properties of the powder are a function of the aggregated mass--with some kernels slightly heavier, some slightly lighter. If you tried to use a lab scale to &quot;hand-pick&quot; virtually identical kernels you would then end up with an aggregate that would be different than what the manufacturer delivered in the powder jug. The collection of hand-sorted kernels could have greater or lesser density or energy. This, in turn, could perform very differently than the powder &quot;as delivered&quot; by the manufacturer.

The conclusion is that, even if you are tempted, you should NOT use an ultra-precise scale to hand-sort kernels, trying to select only those that are most uniform.

Good point Scott has raised here -- that this super-precise weighing capability might tempt someone into trying a procedure (weight-sorting individual kernels), that could cause problems.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Editor: Scott Parker commented that, given the promised resolution of laboratory-grade scales: &#8220;Someone, somewhere, will eventually use one of these damned things to start sorting powder by kernel weight and blow their gun apart.&#8221;</p>
<p>Editor: What Scott means, I think, is that individual grains of powder are not all exactly the same in weight or shape. The predicted properties of the powder are a function of the aggregated mass&#8211;with some kernels slightly heavier, some slightly lighter. If you tried to use a lab scale to &#8220;hand-pick&#8221; virtually identical kernels you would then end up with an aggregate that would be different than what the manufacturer delivered in the powder jug. The collection of hand-sorted kernels could have greater or lesser density or energy. This, in turn, could perform very differently than the powder &#8220;as delivered&#8221; by the manufacturer.</p>
<p>The conclusion is that, even if you are tempted, you should NOT use an ultra-precise scale to hand-sort kernels, trying to select only those that are most uniform.</p>
<p>Good point Scott has raised here &#8212; that this super-precise weighing capability might tempt someone into trying a procedure (weight-sorting individual kernels), that could cause problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Ronemus</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2008/08/ten-commandments-for-electronic-scales/comment-page-1/#comment-1486</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Ronemus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 23:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=1872#comment-1486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even though they&#039;re too small to feel, drafts can cause fluctuating and erratic readings.  I cut the top and one side from a cardboard box, then set it open end down over the scale with the open top forward.  That allows easy access while blocking drafts, and it&#039;s easily removed for maintenance, etc. since the scale rests directly on the bench.  Use the smallest box that allows access while reloading to get the maximum benefit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though they&#8217;re too small to feel, drafts can cause fluctuating and erratic readings.  I cut the top and one side from a cardboard box, then set it open end down over the scale with the open top forward.  That allows easy access while blocking drafts, and it&#8217;s easily removed for maintenance, etc. since the scale rests directly on the bench.  Use the smallest box that allows access while reloading to get the maximum benefit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
