<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spreadsheet Formula Calculates Useful Barrel Life</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2008/10/spreadsheet-formula-calculates-useful-barrel-life/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2008/10/spreadsheet-formula-calculates-useful-barrel-life/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 23:02:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2008/10/spreadsheet-formula-calculates-useful-barrel-life/comment-page-1/#comment-52633</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 02:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=3003#comment-52633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are there updated powder heat potential numbers for the new IMR Enduron powders available somewhere? I love this spreadsheet for deciding on my pet loads.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are there updated powder heat potential numbers for the new IMR Enduron powders available somewhere? I love this spreadsheet for deciding on my pet loads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2008/10/spreadsheet-formula-calculates-useful-barrel-life/comment-page-1/#comment-1746</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 13:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=3003#comment-1746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i can&#039;t get the dropdown list of the powder heat potential to open up propoly to read all the powders. do you have a list of the powder heat potential for me pleas ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i can&#8217;t get the dropdown list of the powder heat potential to open up propoly to read all the powders. do you have a list of the powder heat potential for me pleas ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom McCrea</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2008/10/spreadsheet-formula-calculates-useful-barrel-life/comment-page-1/#comment-1745</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom McCrea]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 23:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=3003#comment-1745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great comparative tool indeed. Can the barrel life be correlated to the length of throat erosion, how much further out the bullet needs to be seated to touch the lands.
e.g. when the throat is eroded forward .06 or .12 inches, the useful life is over. It is specific measure at least.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great comparative tool indeed. Can the barrel life be correlated to the length of throat erosion, how much further out the bullet needs to be seated to touch the lands.<br />
e.g. when the throat is eroded forward .06 or .12 inches, the useful life is over. It is specific measure at least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Hames</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2008/10/spreadsheet-formula-calculates-useful-barrel-life/comment-page-1/#comment-1744</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian Hames]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 16:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=3003#comment-1744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it an excellent guideline, as is the quantifiable  overbore index, but just like tire &quot;tread life&quot; there are an infinite number of user-related and equipment tolerance-related variables that will affect the end point.
Thanks for taking the time to share this!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it an excellent guideline, as is the quantifiable  overbore index, but just like tire &#8220;tread life&#8221; there are an infinite number of user-related and equipment tolerance-related variables that will affect the end point.<br />
Thanks for taking the time to share this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Crawford</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2008/10/spreadsheet-formula-calculates-useful-barrel-life/comment-page-1/#comment-1743</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Crawford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 16:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=3003#comment-1743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My numbers for powder heat are from QuickLoad. I&#039;m used to using PSI since it&#039;s a real value of measurement. But When I get off nightshift, I&#039;ll look into a CUP/PSI conversion, and consider modifying the sheet to take either. Good idea.
A barrel life-vs-pressure plot(and others) would be an easy addition. I&#039;ll work on it as well.

But please keep in mind folks that my math only represents tweaked rules of thumb used to define consistently claimed accuracy from barrels. Nothing has ever been officially measured as far as I&#039;m aware(like accuracy-vs-shot count-vs-pressure-vs-powder-vs-shot rate-vs-steel grade).
It&#039;s best use is for comparisons.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My numbers for powder heat are from QuickLoad. I&#8217;m used to using PSI since it&#8217;s a real value of measurement. But When I get off nightshift, I&#8217;ll look into a CUP/PSI conversion, and consider modifying the sheet to take either. Good idea.<br />
A barrel life-vs-pressure plot(and others) would be an easy addition. I&#8217;ll work on it as well.</p>
<p>But please keep in mind folks that my math only represents tweaked rules of thumb used to define consistently claimed accuracy from barrels. Nothing has ever been officially measured as far as I&#8217;m aware(like accuracy-vs-shot count-vs-pressure-vs-powder-vs-shot rate-vs-steel grade).<br />
It&#8217;s best use is for comparisons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve podleski</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2008/10/spreadsheet-formula-calculates-useful-barrel-life/comment-page-1/#comment-1742</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steve podleski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 22:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=3003#comment-1742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since many do not have access to the program that calculates pressure , it would be nice to be able to quickly plot barrel life versus pressure.  Otherwise great program!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since many do not have access to the program that calculates pressure , it would be nice to be able to quickly plot barrel life versus pressure.  Otherwise great program!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pao</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2008/10/spreadsheet-formula-calculates-useful-barrel-life/comment-page-1/#comment-1741</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pao]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=3003#comment-1741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You need to accommodate for Barrel Pressure in CUP also.  Many manufacture show CUP for most common powder used.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You need to accommodate for Barrel Pressure in CUP also.  Many manufacture show CUP for most common powder used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Pellegrene</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2008/10/spreadsheet-formula-calculates-useful-barrel-life/comment-page-1/#comment-1740</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe Pellegrene]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=3003#comment-1740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike,

Is there a reason why the N165 has such a lower heat potential than all the other Vihtavuori powders?

Thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p>
<p>Is there a reason why the N165 has such a lower heat potential than all the other Vihtavuori powders?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
