<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: QuickLOAD Software Updates Available</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2009/01/quickload-software-updates-available/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2009/01/quickload-software-updates-available/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 15:50:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2009/01/quickload-software-updates-available/comment-page-1/#comment-1935</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 03:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=4364#comment-1935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is there updated info available on the newer non lead bullets such as Nosler E-Tip and barnes TSX?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there updated info available on the newer non lead bullets such as Nosler E-Tip and barnes TSX?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rblong</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2009/01/quickload-software-updates-available/comment-page-1/#comment-1934</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rblong]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=4364#comment-1934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t remember seeing this software before, and it seems to be a considerable accomplishment relative to figuring out new loads or refining existing ones.  Only this is, without the primer data included in some significant manner, there is still a ton of speculation left to the shooter.  Llkely, having only one major component as an unknown is better than having all of them hanging out there, but personally I have been surprised more than once with the degree of difference primers can make on any given load.  I know some of us pick a primer and stay with it regardless.  If reliable primer data were included, $250.00 wouldn&#039;t be too much to pay for the program.
Good would then be wonderful.  RL]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t remember seeing this software before, and it seems to be a considerable accomplishment relative to figuring out new loads or refining existing ones.  Only this is, without the primer data included in some significant manner, there is still a ton of speculation left to the shooter.  Llkely, having only one major component as an unknown is better than having all of them hanging out there, but personally I have been surprised more than once with the degree of difference primers can make on any given load.  I know some of us pick a primer and stay with it regardless.  If reliable primer data were included, $250.00 wouldn&#8217;t be too much to pay for the program.<br />
Good would then be wonderful.  RL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
