Comments on: SHOT Show Report: March 36-55 BR Scope + Revolutionary 1:10 Ratio Zooms

By: AP

AP — Sun, 01 Feb 2009 20:10:17 +0000

The reticles mentioned in the articles; are they Mil or MOA based?

By: Leslie

Leslie — Wed, 21 Jan 2009 01:42:54 +0000

If they can make 10 power than why not 10×100?
Yes, a tad bigger objective would be needed, but so what…

EDITOR: Once the exit pupil is under about 1mm it becomes very, very difficult to work with — basically you just have a tiny dot of light. Realistically, for a 100-power scope you’d want a front objective of 85mm or larger. That will make for some BIG class.

In the not-too-distant future, however, I could see a high-magnification scope combined with a high-pixel receptor like in a digital camera. This would allow you to view the image on a small screen mounted on or beside the rifle. That would allow extreme magnification without the limitations of a tiny exit pupil

By: benny hill

benny hill — Tue, 20 Jan 2009 21:38:04 +0000

What is the F.O.V. @ 100 yds on 1x

By: smackumdown

smackumdown — Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:55:55 +0000

its looks amazin
what realy gets me is that alot of the tactical guys use mills as do us army and so forth why limit a brilliant scope to just moa just my opinion but i think its behind the times

By: Fred Bohl

Fred Bohl — Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:41:49 +0000

Does the 36-55 EP Zoom still have diopter correction in the eyepiece for those of us with less than perfect eyesight?

Will a proliferation of models further limit the availability of the models preferred by precision shooters?

If the US military get interested will that demand eliminate Deon as a supplier of civilian scopes as happened at US Optics?

By: Leslie

Leslie — Tue, 20 Jan 2009 03:01:27 +0000

No comments?
Everyone must be speechless!
I know I am(almost).