<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Timney Introduces New Trigger for Ruger 10/22</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2009/01/timney-introduces-new-trigger-for-ruger-1022/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2009/01/timney-introduces-new-trigger-for-ruger-1022/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 14:59:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Rodriguez</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2009/01/timney-introduces-new-trigger-for-ruger-1022/comment-page-1/#comment-53493</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Luis Rodriguez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 12:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=4318#comment-53493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am 4H 22rifle coach and as stated by other people we have competition which require a 3 pound test minimum requirement .Thank you timmey for making this available.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am 4H 22rifle coach and as stated by other people we have competition which require a 3 pound test minimum requirement .Thank you timmey for making this available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G Bonanza</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2009/01/timney-introduces-new-trigger-for-ruger-1022/comment-page-1/#comment-26833</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[G Bonanza]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 05:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=4318#comment-26833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I Had the same problem, talked to the same guy and got fed up with the darn thing. I stuck it in the safe for 6 months and forgot about it. I took it out and now that the trigger spring has loosened up a little it cycles most 22 ammo (except my favorite cci mini mag) without a problem.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I Had the same problem, talked to the same guy and got fed up with the darn thing. I stuck it in the safe for 6 months and forgot about it. I took it out and now that the trigger spring has loosened up a little it cycles most 22 ammo (except my favorite cci mini mag) without a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grover</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2009/01/timney-introduces-new-trigger-for-ruger-1022/comment-page-1/#comment-15734</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grover]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 23:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=4318#comment-15734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I Installed Timney Trigger in 10/22 and at first was pleased on eaze of instalation and crisp trigger feel.  However, upon test firing found that hammer would fail to lock back on every shot.  Spent case was ejected and fresh round in chamber but hammer not cocked. I spoke with Keven at Timney and sent unit back.  After several weeks they sent the unit back, no explanation of anything done and I still have same problem.  Intalled  Volquartsen trigger and the rifle shoots just fine.  So much for Timney!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I Installed Timney Trigger in 10/22 and at first was pleased on eaze of instalation and crisp trigger feel.  However, upon test firing found that hammer would fail to lock back on every shot.  Spent case was ejected and fresh round in chamber but hammer not cocked. I spoke with Keven at Timney and sent unit back.  After several weeks they sent the unit back, no explanation of anything done and I still have same problem.  Intalled  Volquartsen trigger and the rifle shoots just fine.  So much for Timney!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krey</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2009/01/timney-introduces-new-trigger-for-ruger-1022/comment-page-1/#comment-1927</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Krey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 12:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=4318#comment-1927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t know much of anything about the 10/22 other than I want one, now! Is there realy any difference in the older and newer models in acuracy and how they shoot?
I&#039;ve looked around at the new guns available and for the stainless look I like it&#039;ll run from $250 to $275 when they can get one; but, thats for the weatherized stainless finish and I prefer the regulsr old style stainless finish wich is not offered new today.
I went to a gun show yesterday and saw an old Walmart, supposedly &quot;distributers limited model&quot; in the old style stainless for $350.
The green laminated stock had no noticable dings or scraches in the stock and looked like it had not been shot much, i&#039;d give it an excellant condition rating.
I have heard from several dealers while looking at the newer models that they are more accureate than the old ones, why would that be?
Have they changed something about the gun; the barrel, the trigger, anything, or is this just smoke?
I plan to get an after market laminated walnut stock cause I realy like the look of stainless and wood.


Thanks for your opinion
Krey
Little Rock, Arkansas]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know much of anything about the 10/22 other than I want one, now! Is there realy any difference in the older and newer models in acuracy and how they shoot?<br />
I&#8217;ve looked around at the new guns available and for the stainless look I like it&#8217;ll run from $250 to $275 when they can get one; but, thats for the weatherized stainless finish and I prefer the regulsr old style stainless finish wich is not offered new today.<br />
I went to a gun show yesterday and saw an old Walmart, supposedly &#8220;distributers limited model&#8221; in the old style stainless for $350.<br />
The green laminated stock had no noticable dings or scraches in the stock and looked like it had not been shot much, i&#8217;d give it an excellant condition rating.<br />
I have heard from several dealers while looking at the newer models that they are more accureate than the old ones, why would that be?<br />
Have they changed something about the gun; the barrel, the trigger, anything, or is this just smoke?<br />
I plan to get an after market laminated walnut stock cause I realy like the look of stainless and wood.</p>
<p>Thanks for your opinion<br />
Krey<br />
Little Rock, Arkansas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim in MI</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2009/01/timney-introduces-new-trigger-for-ruger-1022/comment-page-1/#comment-1926</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim in MI]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=4318#comment-1926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Rimfire Sporter matches as conducted by the CMP require a minimum trigger pull of 3 lbs.  These matches are becoming quite popular,  so these triggers would be perfect for those shooters]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Rimfire Sporter matches as conducted by the CMP require a minimum trigger pull of 3 lbs.  These matches are becoming quite popular,  so these triggers would be perfect for those shooters</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
