Comments on: Zeiss Victory RF Binoculars Win Optics Awards https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2009/03/zeiss-victory-rf-binoculars-win-optics-awards/ from AccurateShooter.com Sat, 04 Jul 2026 23:02:57 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26 By: UK Binoculars Direct https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2009/03/zeiss-victory-rf-binoculars-win-optics-awards/comment-page-1/#comment-2216 Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:03:30 +0000 http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=5383#comment-2216 The idea of range finding binos is a good one, but the technology just hasn’t caught up yet. I like Zeiss a lot and for power to weight can’t fault them. Having said that I like Lieca too. Since they’ve changed the no fault policy I’m not so keen though.

]]> By: bluetentacle https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2009/03/zeiss-victory-rf-binoculars-win-optics-awards/comment-page-1/#comment-2215 Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:30:51 +0000 http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=5383#comment-2215 The Zeiss BIS is a scam. It doesn’t actually calculate anything, but merely looks up a predefined table of trajectories and picks the closest distance. And there’s no way to enter your own ballistic data either–you must select from a limited set of trajectories one that approximates your load. Lame.

http://www.zeiss.com/C12567A800347580/EmbedTitelIntern/RF_Programme_EN/$File/RF_Programme_EN.pdf

]]>