<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Baney Tests Multiple Powders in 6-6.5&#215;47</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2009/04/baney-tests-multiple-powders-in-6-65x47/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2009/04/baney-tests-multiple-powders-in-6-65x47/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 14:06:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian H.</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2009/04/baney-tests-multiple-powders-in-6-65x47/comment-page-1/#comment-2401</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian H.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=5901#comment-2401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had many problems getting reasonable accuracy out of my original 1:8 twist 6X47. I tried a host of powders, including the very-available H4350.

The holy grail was VW N560. I note you have tested 160 and 550 but not 560. 39 grains was producing velocities about 3025, (from a 28&quot; .236 Krieger 1:8)with plenty more room, but accuracy dropped off any faster.

I have since re-barrelled in a 1:7 for using heavy bullets, but I did try 105&#039;s and 560 is still phenomenally accurate

Unfortunately in Canada we are years behind in receiving new powder like RL17.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had many problems getting reasonable accuracy out of my original 1:8 twist 6X47. I tried a host of powders, including the very-available H4350.</p>
<p>The holy grail was VW N560. I note you have tested 160 and 550 but not 560. 39 grains was producing velocities about 3025, (from a 28&#8243; .236 Krieger 1:8)with plenty more room, but accuracy dropped off any faster.</p>
<p>I have since re-barrelled in a 1:7 for using heavy bullets, but I did try 105&#8217;s and 560 is still phenomenally accurate</p>
<p>Unfortunately in Canada we are years behind in receiving new powder like RL17.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wlaursen</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2009/04/baney-tests-multiple-powders-in-6-65x47/comment-page-1/#comment-2400</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wlaursen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 20:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=5901#comment-2400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jason, you need to add IMR4007 to your list of powders to test for the 6x47.  40.5gn of 4007, BR4, 105 Berger (moly) clocked 3198 fps (e-4 &amp; s-2)out of 30 inch bartlein with 3 lug bat.  38.7gn of 4007, BR4, 115 DTAC (moly) clocked 3060 fps, e-6 &amp; s-4.  38.5gn with the DTAC produced a 5 shot group of .805 x .558 inches at 600 yards during one of our Monday practices at Sac Valley.
Wally Laursen]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason, you need to add IMR4007 to your list of powders to test for the 6&#215;47.  40.5gn of 4007, BR4, 105 Berger (moly) clocked 3198 fps (e-4 &amp; s-2)out of 30 inch bartlein with 3 lug bat.  38.7gn of 4007, BR4, 115 DTAC (moly) clocked 3060 fps, e-6 &amp; s-4.  38.5gn with the DTAC produced a 5 shot group of .805 x .558 inches at 600 yards during one of our Monday practices at Sac Valley.<br />
Wally Laursen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M Halmo</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2009/04/baney-tests-multiple-powders-in-6-65x47/comment-page-1/#comment-2399</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[M Halmo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=5901#comment-2399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What weight bullets were used to get the velocities posted?

Editor: All testing thus far was done with 105gr Berger VLDs. Jason will test 115s, 95s, and 80s next week.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What weight bullets were used to get the velocities posted?</p>
<p>Editor: All testing thus far was done with 105gr Berger VLDs. Jason will test 115s, 95s, and 80s next week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PAUL BOWERS</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2009/04/baney-tests-multiple-powders-in-6-65x47/comment-page-1/#comment-2398</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PAUL BOWERS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=5901#comment-2398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I HAVE A 6X47 /1/8 TWIST NEED A STARTING POINT FOR LOADS]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I HAVE A 6X47 /1/8 TWIST NEED A STARTING POINT FOR LOADS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clouse</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2009/04/baney-tests-multiple-powders-in-6-65x47/comment-page-1/#comment-2397</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clouse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 19:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=5901#comment-2397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looking forward to the 6.5/47 report and hopefully a sidebar slot for 6 &amp; 6.5/47]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking forward to the 6.5/47 report and hopefully a sidebar slot for 6 &amp; 6.5/47</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
