<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good Reading in September Target Shooter Magazine</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2009/09/good-reading-in-september-target-shooter-magazine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2009/09/good-reading-in-september-target-shooter-magazine/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 20:57:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Duncan</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2009/09/good-reading-in-september-target-shooter-magazine/comment-page-1/#comment-2857</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Duncan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 01:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=8454#comment-2857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I use a Forster press, and take it--perhaps as an act of faith?--to be the best for what I need. I don&#039;t use it for priming, and while I&#039;m certain the good folks at Forster would like to believe it&#039;s fine, there really isn&#039;t anything, to my knowledge, better than a hand priming tool.

I&#039;m not certain the reviewer had time for an in-depth analysis, but... I would have liked to learn a little more about the unique Forster feature that enables one to increase the dimension of the spread between the shellholder jaws for bullet seating.

Which permits, ostensibly, the case to align better with the bullet seating die.

Does anyone care to comment on this feature?

As to the Sightron &quot;review&quot;, the writer meanders around the history of BR scopes, and finishes with one paragraph on the two Sightron 36x42 scopes.

I have both of these, and shoot the Big Sky for long range, but, would... well, have appreciated a box test.

For instance.

I applaud the effort that it takes to put together this on-line magazine [but wish the reviews could have gone into more detail.]

RBD

N.B.  It may also be... the fact that Paul has set standards for product reviews on this website so high--and that his reviewers are so well qualified--that I&#039;m spoiled.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use a Forster press, and take it&#8211;perhaps as an act of faith?&#8211;to be the best for what I need. I don&#8217;t use it for priming, and while I&#8217;m certain the good folks at Forster would like to believe it&#8217;s fine, there really isn&#8217;t anything, to my knowledge, better than a hand priming tool.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not certain the reviewer had time for an in-depth analysis, but&#8230; I would have liked to learn a little more about the unique Forster feature that enables one to increase the dimension of the spread between the shellholder jaws for bullet seating.</p>
<p>Which permits, ostensibly, the case to align better with the bullet seating die.</p>
<p>Does anyone care to comment on this feature?</p>
<p>As to the Sightron &#8220;review&#8221;, the writer meanders around the history of BR scopes, and finishes with one paragraph on the two Sightron 36&#215;42 scopes.</p>
<p>I have both of these, and shoot the Big Sky for long range, but, would&#8230; well, have appreciated a box test.</p>
<p>For instance.</p>
<p>I applaud the effort that it takes to put together this on-line magazine [but wish the reviews could have gone into more detail.]</p>
<p>RBD</p>
<p>N.B.  It may also be&#8230; the fact that Paul has set standards for product reviews on this website so high&#8211;and that his reviewers are so well qualified&#8211;that I&#8217;m spoiled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
