<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coming Soon&#8230; Ballistics Software Package for Cell Phones</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2009/10/coming-soon-ballistics-software-package-for-cell-phones/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2009/10/coming-soon-ballistics-software-package-for-cell-phones/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 14:59:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fab</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2009/10/coming-soon-ballistics-software-package-for-cell-phones/comment-page-1/#comment-3039</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fab]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 08:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=9082#comment-3039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the other hand, what you meant by &quot;universal app&quot; ?

Java is good only on certain phones, (Symbian especially) but Windows Mobile and iPhone are so far very well established platforms, in fact they are dominating the mobile market in terms of features and availability of apps.

Besides the fact that any application that runs on a PDA (Windows Mobile-based) will run also on any PHONE running WM, so why the issue with PDAs? Today such distintion is non-existent.

Please, could you show some screenshots? The website does not show any, at least I cannot find any there.

Does the app include G7 and graphical output?

thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the other hand, what you meant by &#8220;universal app&#8221; ?</p>
<p>Java is good only on certain phones, (Symbian especially) but Windows Mobile and iPhone are so far very well established platforms, in fact they are dominating the mobile market in terms of features and availability of apps.</p>
<p>Besides the fact that any application that runs on a PDA (Windows Mobile-based) will run also on any PHONE running WM, so why the issue with PDAs? Today such distintion is non-existent.</p>
<p>Please, could you show some screenshots? The website does not show any, at least I cannot find any there.</p>
<p>Does the app include G7 and graphical output?</p>
<p>thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fab</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2009/10/coming-soon-ballistics-software-package-for-cell-phones/comment-page-1/#comment-3038</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fab]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 08:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=9082#comment-3038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please, could you explaion what engine is your software based on?

It seems like that the proclaimed accuracy is TOO optimistics to say the least.

You know, the real test is in the transonic/subsonic range.

thanks and good luck!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please, could you explaion what engine is your software based on?</p>
<p>It seems like that the proclaimed accuracy is TOO optimistics to say the least.</p>
<p>You know, the real test is in the transonic/subsonic range.</p>
<p>thanks and good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafal</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2009/10/coming-soon-ballistics-software-package-for-cell-phones/comment-page-1/#comment-3037</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rafal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 06:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=9082#comment-3037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Algorithm for calculator is rather unique and can&#039;t be simple compared to known ballistic models but it was designed to work with G1 BC (IMHO it works very good with it). For now we are not planing to make G7 version...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Algorithm for calculator is rather unique and can&#8217;t be simple compared to known ballistic models but it was designed to work with G1 BC (IMHO it works very good with it). For now we are not planing to make G7 version&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2009/10/coming-soon-ballistics-software-package-for-cell-phones/comment-page-1/#comment-3036</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 21:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=9082#comment-3036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will you be offering the program using the G7 BC?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will you be offering the program using the G7 BC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafal</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2009/10/coming-soon-ballistics-software-package-for-cell-phones/comment-page-1/#comment-3035</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rafal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=9082#comment-3035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe you didn&#039;t uncheck the standard box for altitude 300 ft osl and changed conditions below. As noted in the tooltips, if you mark this option the standard conditions on elevation 100 m (300 ft) over sea level will be used for calculation and values below will be ignored.

Editor: I used the online KABAL program and it was within 1 quarter-MOA click of my actual comeups at 400, 500, and 600 yards.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you didn&#8217;t uncheck the standard box for altitude 300 ft osl and changed conditions below. As noted in the tooltips, if you mark this option the standard conditions on elevation 100 m (300 ft) over sea level will be used for calculation and values below will be ignored.</p>
<p>Editor: I used the online KABAL program and it was within 1 quarter-MOA click of my actual comeups at 400, 500, and 600 yards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arlin</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2009/10/coming-soon-ballistics-software-package-for-cell-phones/comment-page-1/#comment-3034</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[arlin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=9082#comment-3034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[well I did this thing 6 times, since I shoot a lot at 600 yards  the frist time was the close&#039;s,it was with in 2 clicks under the condistions I put in after that it gave all different clicks, high as 9 clicks off. I did not change a thing. I have 4 different shooting programs and one in a hand held that I use hunting all so a hand held weather station with wind speed est. and GPs&#039;s and range finders,so I do know what I&#039;m doing.maybe something in the program of yours or maybe I left something out. Any rate, my 308 use&#039;s were I shoot from 88-90 clicks as you know depending on the weather. Good luck with that program. I think it&#039;s about time.
sincerely
Arlin]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well I did this thing 6 times, since I shoot a lot at 600 yards  the frist time was the close&#8217;s,it was with in 2 clicks under the condistions I put in after that it gave all different clicks, high as 9 clicks off. I did not change a thing. I have 4 different shooting programs and one in a hand held that I use hunting all so a hand held weather station with wind speed est. and GPs&#8217;s and range finders,so I do know what I&#8217;m doing.maybe something in the program of yours or maybe I left something out. Any rate, my 308 use&#8217;s were I shoot from 88-90 clicks as you know depending on the weather. Good luck with that program. I think it&#8217;s about time.<br />
sincerely<br />
Arlin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
