Comments on: United Nations & IANSA Global Gun Control Agenda Revealed

By: Bill L

Bill L — Wed, 25 Apr 2012 12:23:18 +0000

They can get my guns when they prey them from my cold dead hands.

By: sean daw

sean daw — Thu, 07 Apr 2011 03:25:45 +0000

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQX64xOd-Us&feature=related

By: David G

David G — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:53:43 +0000

So do you think the ADL is good for gun and free speech rights ?

By: john

john — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:00:05 +0000

look at the U.S. for money to help then try and tell us how to live..
why don’t the rich guy give his money to some needy country and but out of the way U.S people live…..

By: Henry Barker

Henry Barker — Tue, 22 Dec 2009 12:02:45 +0000

As A kiwi shooter and thank god we do not have much gun crime in NZ.
From here it appears that the gun violence issue is a violence issue , a social issue !
Fix the social issues!
look at the places that have gun violence issues
slums and dysfunctional countries; I wonder why ?
I ask why some billionaire is bankrolling the anti gun movement what are his plans, who is he planning to rob ? or perhaps enslave

You in the US seem to have a strong christian ethic that helps you live together long may it last

Lets bear a thought this Christmas for all those less fortunate than ourselves especially in this time of recession and the freezing winter conditions in your part of the world

ps what is the point of banning firearms
Now days IEDs are a much more dramatic option and the knowledge is much available, and do not forget good old rope and lampposts
pps
maybe bin Ladin hit the wrong building

By: Greg Harman

Greg Harman — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:08:06 +0000

While the Constitution remains the “law of the land”, any Treaty ratified by the Senate and signed by the President, becomes the “law of the land”. Will a treaty, that is enimical to the U.S. Constitution, trump Constitutional Rights? That is not a question with which I would want to experiment! Give no inch, not one jot or tiddle or we will be forced into endless judicial manuverings and “opinions” rendered that will effectively criminalize every honest and responsible Citizen with the stroke of a pen! To retrieve what is lost is much more difficult than keeping what we have. Just ask the Aussies! Greg

By: Tom Alves

Tom Alves — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 18:22:45 +0000

Alarmist or not the threat is real and complacency or denial allow these people to act. The fact is that we have a President who is beholden to Soros and a Democrat majority in the Senate that has alot of anti-gun members. All the United States has to do is agree to the treaty and get it approved by the Senate. The House will have NO VOTE. Then, the Executive Branch–read Eric holder–can promugate regulations persuant to that treaty and GUT OUT the Second Amendment. If you don’t believe me look what kind of fight is going on since the Heller case was won in DC. The battle is NEVER OVER. The CIFTA treaty is another threat of the same nature from the OAS.