<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LaserLyte Offers Laser Integrated into Pistol Rear Sight</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2010/04/laserlyte-offers-laser-integrated-into-pistol-rear-sight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2010/04/laserlyte-offers-laser-integrated-into-pistol-rear-sight/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 15:31:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: M4SOPMOD</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2010/04/laserlyte-offers-laser-integrated-into-pistol-rear-sight/comment-page-1/#comment-56213</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[M4SOPMOD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 02:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=12913#comment-56213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rich Kayser - I&#039;m not sure if you are part of any actual department.  If so I hope and pray that they suspend you for such comments and get you some training - or just outright fire you over psych-eval.
  
Perhaps you should patrol your own community for a change of pace - rather than wage the war you are fighting here at home against your fellow citizens.

Effective use of force is a LIFE SAVING endeavor - for both perp and officer.  Besides, good officer safety dictates a policy that REQUIRES the immediate draw of lethal if no backup is present AND ANY reasonable risk exists.  While you give no timeframe for perp compliance, it would seem that you champion the same &quot;shoot first&quot; policy that effectively eliminates the deterring effect of lethal force presence, and I assure you that will not pass any sniff test for justifiable force.  Nor should it.  

&quot;Lack of Compliance&quot; and &quot;Threat&quot; are not the same thing - but that&#039;s not to say that one does not lead to the other.

I cannot imagine any such &quot;Kill or be Punished&quot; policy surviving the first lawsuit, and that&#039;s assuming you aren&#039;t just full of crap - which is a long shot, to be sure.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich Kayser &#8211; I&#8217;m not sure if you are part of any actual department.  If so I hope and pray that they suspend you for such comments and get you some training &#8211; or just outright fire you over psych-eval.</p>
<p>Perhaps you should patrol your own community for a change of pace &#8211; rather than wage the war you are fighting here at home against your fellow citizens.</p>
<p>Effective use of force is a LIFE SAVING endeavor &#8211; for both perp and officer.  Besides, good officer safety dictates a policy that REQUIRES the immediate draw of lethal if no backup is present AND ANY reasonable risk exists.  While you give no timeframe for perp compliance, it would seem that you champion the same &#8220;shoot first&#8221; policy that effectively eliminates the deterring effect of lethal force presence, and I assure you that will not pass any sniff test for justifiable force.  Nor should it.  </p>
<p>&#8220;Lack of Compliance&#8221; and &#8220;Threat&#8221; are not the same thing &#8211; but that&#8217;s not to say that one does not lead to the other.</p>
<p>I cannot imagine any such &#8220;Kill or be Punished&#8221; policy surviving the first lawsuit, and that&#8217;s assuming you aren&#8217;t just full of crap &#8211; which is a long shot, to be sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Kayser</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2010/04/laserlyte-offers-laser-integrated-into-pistol-rear-sight/comment-page-1/#comment-56203</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rich Kayser]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2018 06:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=12913#comment-56203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our PD policy is: if an officer takes his sidearm out of its&#039; holster, he needs to use it unless the perp complies with the officers&#039; directive.  Failure to do so results in a 30 day (iirc) suspension.

My personal policy follows theirs...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our PD policy is: if an officer takes his sidearm out of its&#8217; holster, he needs to use it unless the perp complies with the officers&#8217; directive.  Failure to do so results in a 30 day (iirc) suspension.</p>
<p>My personal policy follows theirs&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suman</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2010/04/laserlyte-offers-laser-integrated-into-pistol-rear-sight/comment-page-1/#comment-14278</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[suman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 09:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=12913#comment-14278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i really want that gun i will pay how much you want please send me mail]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i really want that gun i will pay how much you want please send me mail</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
