<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Report: Thinner Neck-Walls on Latest Lapua 6mmBR Brass</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2010/07/report-thinner-neck-walls-on-latest-lapua-6mmbr-brass/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2010/07/report-thinner-neck-walls-on-latest-lapua-6mmbr-brass/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 15:31:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikecr</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2010/07/report-thinner-neck-walls-on-latest-lapua-6mmbr-brass/comment-page-1/#comment-6086</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mikecr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 23:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=17169#comment-6086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s a stretch to declare benefit from changing brass...
Now we&#039;d start over to replace it, as segregating, multi-bushings and tension change would negate the &#039;benefit&#039; of no-turn necks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a stretch to declare benefit from changing brass&#8230;<br />
Now we&#8217;d start over to replace it, as segregating, multi-bushings and tension change would negate the &#8216;benefit&#8217; of no-turn necks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
