<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NSSF Supports ATF Modernization Legislation</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2010/09/nssf-supports-atf-modernization-legislation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2010/09/nssf-supports-atf-modernization-legislation/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 14:06:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Harris</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2010/09/nssf-supports-atf-modernization-legislation/comment-page-1/#comment-7297</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Harris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=18948#comment-7297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) is supporting.............more rights and due process in the regulatory scheme.(scheme- a scam, to plan in a deceitful way, to plot) Really?
 I could understand supporting that part of THE LAW, which recognizes and protects the unalienable right to keep and bare arms and prohibits the infringement thereof, as declared in Article Two of the Bill of Rights.
 Would not the nullification of an unlawful act such as the Gun Control Act of 1968 pretty much resolve all of the problems with the regulatory scheme and the enforcers?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) is supporting&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.more rights and due process in the regulatory scheme.(scheme- a scam, to plan in a deceitful way, to plot) Really?<br />
 I could understand supporting that part of THE LAW, which recognizes and protects the unalienable right to keep and bare arms and prohibits the infringement thereof, as declared in Article Two of the Bill of Rights.<br />
 Would not the nullification of an unlawful act such as the Gun Control Act of 1968 pretty much resolve all of the problems with the regulatory scheme and the enforcers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
