<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Mag-fed Rimfire Carbine from Russia &#8212; Coming Soon</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2010/11/baikal-mp161k-carbine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2010/11/baikal-mp161k-carbine/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 23:02:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2010/11/baikal-mp161k-carbine/comment-page-1/#comment-10487</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 21:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=20891#comment-10487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not that it hasn&#039;t been successful (look at the AK-47) but Russian reliability means loose tolerances and a loss of accuracy. Who needs a .22 rimfire that will still fire after being filled with mud and sand? Hey, it&#039;s still Minute of Barn.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that it hasn&#8217;t been successful (look at the AK-47) but Russian reliability means loose tolerances and a loss of accuracy. Who needs a .22 rimfire that will still fire after being filled with mud and sand? Hey, it&#8217;s still Minute of Barn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Editor</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2010/11/baikal-mp161k-carbine/comment-page-1/#comment-10440</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 06:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=20891#comment-10440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The bipod installation on the gun in the lower photo was an owner addition. That&#039;s not a factory install or factory-recommended placement.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bipod installation on the gun in the lower photo was an owner addition. That&#8217;s not a factory install or factory-recommended placement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: casspir</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2010/11/baikal-mp161k-carbine/comment-page-1/#comment-10439</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[casspir]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 05:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=20891#comment-10439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No thank you. Ugly gun. Imagine a Bi-Pod on a barrel? I`ll take a Ruger any time and are willing to pay 5 times more for it as well. I want quality. By the look of this rifle it seems like absolute rubbish.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No thank you. Ugly gun. Imagine a Bi-Pod on a barrel? I`ll take a Ruger any time and are willing to pay 5 times more for it as well. I want quality. By the look of this rifle it seems like absolute rubbish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mjeter</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2010/11/baikal-mp161k-carbine/comment-page-1/#comment-10429</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mjeter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 23:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=20891#comment-10429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[cool locking, but leave it to Russians to clamp a bipod to the barrel]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cool locking, but leave it to Russians to clamp a bipod to the barrel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
