Comments on: DOT Plans New Ammo Shipping Regulations https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2010/12/dot-plans-new-ammo-shipping-regulations/ from AccurateShooter.com Sat, 04 Jul 2026 23:02:57 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26 By: dean https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2010/12/dot-plans-new-ammo-shipping-regulations/comment-page-1/#comment-43473 Fri, 08 Nov 2013 05:49:44 +0000 http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=22111#comment-43473 Author Please:

Could it be that fedex will make us be certified in their seminar before they will accept our shipment? Already they are setting them up all over the country. It’s $1000 at an airport hotel.

]]> By: charlie harper https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2010/12/dot-plans-new-ammo-shipping-regulations/comment-page-1/#comment-12822 Sun, 02 Jan 2011 17:59:42 +0000 http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=22111#comment-12822 This is the next step toward one world government,they can’t take away the guns but just make the amo,go away then your guns will not be there problem any more! the UN must remove the guns before the can move there troops into the US like they do in the rest of the world. So get a gun press an learn how to make your owen amo!

]]> By: Matt Groom https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2010/12/dot-plans-new-ammo-shipping-regulations/comment-page-1/#comment-12703 Fri, 31 Dec 2010 04:17:41 +0000 http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=22111#comment-12703 Can you just imagine what kind of black market would emerge if every 70 lbs of ammo had an additional Hazmat fee applied to it? You’d be able to drive state to state with ammo in you trunk, which is not illegal to own, not illegal to possess, not illegal to transport, and not illegal to sell, and sell it at a profit, all while saving the buyer considerable expense. All you’d have to do is say that you aren’t “shipping” it, you own it, which is true.

]]> By: Tom Alves https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2010/12/dot-plans-new-ammo-shipping-regulations/comment-page-1/#comment-12572 Tue, 28 Dec 2010 14:58:07 +0000 http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=22111#comment-12572 I don’t believe anybody should take comfort from this development. the UN is openly hostile to private ownership of firearms and this is another example of our government concedeing authority to an organization that is not answerable to the citizens of the United States through election or recall. If the UN later decideds to change the rules our freedom under the Second Amendment of OUR Constitution is jepordized. Write your Senators and Congressman about this.
Tom Alves

]]>