<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MEDIA Day &#8212; Some Interesting New Products</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2011/01/media-day-some-interesting-new-products/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2011/01/media-day-some-interesting-new-products/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 23:02:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taildrag15X</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2011/01/media-day-some-interesting-new-products/comment-page-1/#comment-13902</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taildrag15X]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 16:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=22793#comment-13902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t remember the polymer case failing as a problem Editor. It was the ammo causing the firearm to fail to feed, projectiles being driven back into the case, and the ever present danger of an explosion of the firearm as the round would and did go off out of battery distroying several test firearms at the facility.

I have to agree with you EB1911 on the Failed NATEC and the almost certain &quot;same stuff&quot; as all the NATEC info, rights and Patents where sold at a public Auction in March 2007. The Auction was held at NATEC&#039;s Factory and office in Plattsburgh, NY.  I was there and purchased a couple of the &quot;test&quot; firearms, ammo, the complete office of the accountant, a friend even bought the riding lawn mower.  

For more on this &quot;old&quot; PCA NATEC stuff check this link:

http://www.afte.org/ExamResources/gallery2/v/Headstamp-Gallery/Letters_001/P_001/PCA.jpg.html

For the Patent link:

http://www.freepatentsonline.com/7059234.html

I never shot the stuff, pulled the bullets (Sierra&#039;s &amp; Hornadys) and scraped the cases as dirty yellow brass as it was selling at the Auction for $7/200 case.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t remember the polymer case failing as a problem Editor. It was the ammo causing the firearm to fail to feed, projectiles being driven back into the case, and the ever present danger of an explosion of the firearm as the round would and did go off out of battery distroying several test firearms at the facility.</p>
<p>I have to agree with you EB1911 on the Failed NATEC and the almost certain &#8220;same stuff&#8221; as all the NATEC info, rights and Patents where sold at a public Auction in March 2007. The Auction was held at NATEC&#8217;s Factory and office in Plattsburgh, NY.  I was there and purchased a couple of the &#8220;test&#8221; firearms, ammo, the complete office of the accountant, a friend even bought the riding lawn mower.  </p>
<p>For more on this &#8220;old&#8221; PCA NATEC stuff check this link:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.afte.org/ExamResources/gallery2/v/Headstamp-Gallery/Letters_001/P_001/PCA.jpg.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.afte.org/ExamResources/gallery2/v/Headstamp-Gallery/Letters_001/P_001/PCA.jpg.html</a></p>
<p>For the Patent link:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.freepatentsonline.com/7059234.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.freepatentsonline.com/7059234.html</a></p>
<p>I never shot the stuff, pulled the bullets (Sierra&#8217;s &amp; Hornadys) and scraped the cases as dirty yellow brass as it was selling at the Auction for $7/200 case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2011/01/media-day-some-interesting-new-products/comment-page-1/#comment-13789</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[B]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 18:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=22793#comment-13789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barret Mrad.

$6K?  Are you kidding?!
We, the public, are not the government with unlimited funds.

Nice ideas, but again out of most of our reach. =P]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barret Mrad.</p>
<p>$6K?  Are you kidding?!<br />
We, the public, are not the government with unlimited funds.</p>
<p>Nice ideas, but again out of most of our reach. =P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Editor</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2011/01/media-day-some-interesting-new-products/comment-page-1/#comment-13786</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 15:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=22793#comment-13786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EB1911 -- Can&#039;t speak to the NATEC product, but the PCP folks were shooting the cartridges at the Media Day and he polymer was holding up. PCP has a patent so maybe something is different or improved.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EB1911 &#8212; Can&#8217;t speak to the NATEC product, but the PCP folks were shooting the cartridges at the Media Day and he polymer was holding up. PCP has a patent so maybe something is different or improved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EB1911</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2011/01/media-day-some-interesting-new-products/comment-page-1/#comment-13785</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EB1911]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 15:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=22793#comment-13785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How is the PCP polymer ammunition any different than the failed Natec polymer ammunition from years ago? It appears to be almost the same product. Certainly not revolutionary. 

http://www.ammobank.com/feature-nt.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is the PCP polymer ammunition any different than the failed Natec polymer ammunition from years ago? It appears to be almost the same product. Certainly not revolutionary. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.ammobank.com/feature-nt.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ammobank.com/feature-nt.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: usw.260</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2011/01/media-day-some-interesting-new-products/comment-page-1/#comment-13784</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[usw.260]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 14:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=22793#comment-13784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Man that 338 Lapua gave me a brused shoulder and I wasn&#039;t even there...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man that 338 Lapua gave me a brused shoulder and I wasn&#8217;t even there&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
