<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nightforce News: CH-Reticle Benchrest Scopes Availability</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2011/09/nightforce-news-ch-reticle-benchrest-scopes-availability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2011/09/nightforce-news-ch-reticle-benchrest-scopes-availability/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 20:26:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2011/09/nightforce-news-ch-reticle-benchrest-scopes-availability/comment-page-1/#comment-19884</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jason]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 21:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=30081#comment-19884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike - the dots in the DD reticle are actually very close to the same size as the dots in the CH2 and CH3]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike &#8211; the dots in the DD reticle are actually very close to the same size as the dots in the CH2 and CH3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: queen_stick</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2011/09/nightforce-news-ch-reticle-benchrest-scopes-availability/comment-page-1/#comment-19866</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[queen_stick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 13:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=30081#comment-19866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have an older NXS 8-32x with the CH1 reticle. I love that scope on my 1K BR rig, but would likely trade it up for a different reticle if I was using it in the field or doing tactical work. I wouldn&#039;t trade it because the cross hair is too thin, but because a plain cross hair gives no actual value to a miss, or a hold-off. I like MOA reticles with MOA knobs, so I&#039;d probably go with the NP-R1 if it wasn&#039;t on a BR rig. For now, my NXS with the CH1 isn&#039;t going anywhere... it&#039;s my favorite scope in the safe right now. (Although, the Sightron SIII 8-32 isn&#039;t too far behind it!)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have an older NXS 8-32x with the CH1 reticle. I love that scope on my 1K BR rig, but would likely trade it up for a different reticle if I was using it in the field or doing tactical work. I wouldn&#8217;t trade it because the cross hair is too thin, but because a plain cross hair gives no actual value to a miss, or a hold-off. I like MOA reticles with MOA knobs, so I&#8217;d probably go with the NP-R1 if it wasn&#8217;t on a BR rig. For now, my NXS with the CH1 isn&#8217;t going anywhere&#8230; it&#8217;s my favorite scope in the safe right now. (Although, the Sightron SIII 8-32 isn&#8217;t too far behind it!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2011/09/nightforce-news-ch-reticle-benchrest-scopes-availability/comment-page-1/#comment-19838</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 21:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=30081#comment-19838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I bet it&#039;s because people mostly get the BR scopes with the NP-2DD reticle. In doing my research, it seems many people find the crosshairs and/or dot too fine and that it tends to get lost. I shoot F-class and have two BRs with the NP-2DD, and it seems many others with BR scopes that I have spoken to have chosen that reticle too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet it&#8217;s because people mostly get the BR scopes with the NP-2DD reticle. In doing my research, it seems many people find the crosshairs and/or dot too fine and that it tends to get lost. I shoot F-class and have two BRs with the NP-2DD, and it seems many others with BR scopes that I have spoken to have chosen that reticle too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
