<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Horner Wins Tactical-Optics Divison At Multigun Nationals</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2011/10/horner-wins-tactical-optics-divison-at-multigun-nationals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2011/10/horner-wins-tactical-optics-divison-at-multigun-nationals/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 14:06:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2011/10/horner-wins-tactical-optics-divison-at-multigun-nationals/comment-page-1/#comment-22016</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 23:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=31500#comment-22016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree that it&#039;s just another &#039;rule-beater&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that it&#8217;s just another &#8216;rule-beater&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2011/10/horner-wins-tactical-optics-divison-at-multigun-nationals/comment-page-1/#comment-21998</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 19:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=31500#comment-21998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually a .300 fireball/trade mark name/whatever you want to call it is not a bad little cartidge at all. Last count, I&#039;ve built about a dozen for friends and family. It makes a great low recoil deer round for youth hunting and a fun round for playing if you live in a suppressor friendly state.

In my circle of friends there have been several one shot kills with both Sub and supersonic ammo, including 1 instance with 2 dead deer for 1 round fired....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually a .300 fireball/trade mark name/whatever you want to call it is not a bad little cartidge at all. Last count, I&#8217;ve built about a dozen for friends and family. It makes a great low recoil deer round for youth hunting and a fun round for playing if you live in a suppressor friendly state.</p>
<p>In my circle of friends there have been several one shot kills with both Sub and supersonic ammo, including 1 instance with 2 dead deer for 1 round fired&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2011/10/horner-wins-tactical-optics-divison-at-multigun-nationals/comment-page-1/#comment-21974</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 02:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=31500#comment-21974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My thoughts on this was, wow it&#039;s a new version of the 1906 30 Remington, but with less power.  I&#039;m not saying I don&#039;t like the wildcatting as I have many myself but I just don&#039;t see the point in all of these &quot;new&quot; cartridges.  Unless it&#039;s the die makers pushing it then I understand :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My thoughts on this was, wow it&#8217;s a new version of the 1906 30 Remington, but with less power.  I&#8217;m not saying I don&#8217;t like the wildcatting as I have many myself but I just don&#8217;t see the point in all of these &#8220;new&#8221; cartridges.  Unless it&#8217;s the die makers pushing it then I understand <img src="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert B</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2011/10/horner-wins-tactical-optics-divison-at-multigun-nationals/comment-page-1/#comment-21962</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert B]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 19:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=31500#comment-21962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 300 BLK with its almost straight case and 30 caliber bullet reminds the .30 Carbine round, (which is a 7.62x33 instead of 7.62x35).  Specs are 110g @ 1900 fps versus 125g @ 2250 fps.  

The OAL of the 300 BLK is 2.26&quot; versus only 1.65&quot; for the .30 Carbine which allows for a more aerodynamic projectile.  

The extra 2mm of case length and slightly larger case diameter provides for more powder capacity and the operating pressure is 55kpsi instead of 38.5kpsi.  This provides a 20% boost in velocity and 40% boost in muzzle energy.

It&#039;s like the .30 Carbine&#039;s big brother.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 300 BLK with its almost straight case and 30 caliber bullet reminds the .30 Carbine round, (which is a 7.62&#215;33 instead of 7.62&#215;35).  Specs are 110g @ 1900 fps versus 125g @ 2250 fps.  </p>
<p>The OAL of the 300 BLK is 2.26&#8243; versus only 1.65&#8243; for the .30 Carbine which allows for a more aerodynamic projectile.  </p>
<p>The extra 2mm of case length and slightly larger case diameter provides for more powder capacity and the operating pressure is 55kpsi instead of 38.5kpsi.  This provides a 20% boost in velocity and 40% boost in muzzle energy.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s like the .30 Carbine&#8217;s big brother.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W. Tipps</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2011/10/horner-wins-tactical-optics-divison-at-multigun-nationals/comment-page-1/#comment-21956</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[W. Tipps]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 18:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=31500#comment-21956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of course AAC was smart enough to get saami specs and not put a strangle hold on its popularity with expensive licensing.  So it may not be “new” but JD Jones wasn’t the first guy to neck-up fireball cases either.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course AAC was smart enough to get saami specs and not put a strangle hold on its popularity with expensive licensing.  So it may not be “new” but JD Jones wasn’t the first guy to neck-up fireball cases either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John S</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2011/10/horner-wins-tactical-optics-divison-at-multigun-nationals/comment-page-1/#comment-21925</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John S]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 01:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=31500#comment-21925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New???  Anyone ever hear of the .300 whisper that came out many years ago?  It&#039;s the same thing, just a .221 Fireball necked up to .30 cal.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New???  Anyone ever hear of the .300 whisper that came out many years ago?  It&#8217;s the same thing, just a .221 Fireball necked up to .30 cal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
