<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Berger 105gr 6mm Hybrid Bullets Perform Well</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2011/10/new-berger-105gr-6mm-hybrid-bullets-perform-well/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2011/10/new-berger-105gr-6mm-hybrid-bullets-perform-well/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 23:50:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SPClark</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2011/10/new-berger-105gr-6mm-hybrid-bullets-perform-well/comment-page-1/#comment-21195</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SPClark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 14:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=31027#comment-21195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My results with the hybrids at 600 yards compare to what Robert&#039;s reporting, despite my shooting them and the 105VLD standard off a bench with a rest &amp; &#039;scope in my 6XC long range rifle.

Shot a match (600 prone w/sling &amp; irons) with my 6HAGAR spacegun, came away with the same impression. These bullets are every bit as fine a product as Berger&#039;s other 6mm bullets &amp; may very well be easier to &quot;tune&quot; loads for.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My results with the hybrids at 600 yards compare to what Robert&#8217;s reporting, despite my shooting them and the 105VLD standard off a bench with a rest &amp; &#8216;scope in my 6XC long range rifle.</p>
<p>Shot a match (600 prone w/sling &amp; irons) with my 6HAGAR spacegun, came away with the same impression. These bullets are every bit as fine a product as Berger&#8217;s other 6mm bullets &amp; may very well be easier to &#8220;tune&#8221; loads for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boyd Allen</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2011/10/new-berger-105gr-6mm-hybrid-bullets-perform-well/comment-page-1/#comment-21177</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boyd Allen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 02:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=31027#comment-21177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robert shot the groups from the prone position, supporting the rifle. Sometimes we forget that the whole world does not revolve around bench shooting. I marvel at the skill that can produce such consistent ten shot groups, half minute of angle, holding the rifle.

Editor: Boyd&#039;s point is well-taken. It goes without saying that, to produce 10-shot half-MOA groups while supporting a rifle only with your arms (and attached sling), you have to start with a very accurate rifle, and an extremely accurate load. That said, many of us are anxious to see how the new 105gr Hybrids perform at 300, 600, and 1000 yards when shot from the bench from a good rest.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert shot the groups from the prone position, supporting the rifle. Sometimes we forget that the whole world does not revolve around bench shooting. I marvel at the skill that can produce such consistent ten shot groups, half minute of angle, holding the rifle.</p>
<p>Editor: Boyd&#8217;s point is well-taken. It goes without saying that, to produce 10-shot half-MOA groups while supporting a rifle only with your arms (and attached sling), you have to start with a very accurate rifle, and an extremely accurate load. That said, many of us are anxious to see how the new 105gr Hybrids perform at 300, 600, and 1000 yards when shot from the bench from a good rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Killshot</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2011/10/new-berger-105gr-6mm-hybrid-bullets-perform-well/comment-page-1/#comment-21165</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Killshot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=31027#comment-21165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I, too, received a box to test from Berger. 

Haven&#039;t rung them out at 600yds yet but the different shape and higher BC should work well. 
Like Robert, I found them to shoot as well or inside of the VLDs during 100yd testing.
However, they did not as shoot well when jumped. At -.020 they open up a small amount, at -.040 it gets bigger and so on.
Not a big deal to me but I assume Berger had hoped that these would work as well when jumped significant amounts such as when using a magazine.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, too, received a box to test from Berger. </p>
<p>Haven&#8217;t rung them out at 600yds yet but the different shape and higher BC should work well.<br />
Like Robert, I found them to shoot as well or inside of the VLDs during 100yd testing.<br />
However, they did not as shoot well when jumped. At -.020 they open up a small amount, at -.040 it gets bigger and so on.<br />
Not a big deal to me but I assume Berger had hoped that these would work as well when jumped significant amounts such as when using a magazine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Hames</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2011/10/new-berger-105gr-6mm-hybrid-bullets-perform-well/comment-page-1/#comment-21162</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian Hames]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 14:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=31027#comment-21162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can&#039;t wait to get my hands on them.

Mr. Whitley, I have looked at your reamer print and note that you are using a .272 neck, which used to be the old &quot;No-Turn&quot; stanard. The new Blue-Box Lapua brass has a slightly less than .013&quot; neck wall thickness.

Also, you don&#039;t spec an extraction taper of half a thou on the necks either.

Your thoughts?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t wait to get my hands on them.</p>
<p>Mr. Whitley, I have looked at your reamer print and note that you are using a .272 neck, which used to be the old &#8220;No-Turn&#8221; stanard. The new Blue-Box Lapua brass has a slightly less than .013&#8243; neck wall thickness.</p>
<p>Also, you don&#8217;t spec an extraction taper of half a thou on the necks either.</p>
<p>Your thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt D.</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2011/10/new-berger-105gr-6mm-hybrid-bullets-perform-well/comment-page-1/#comment-21146</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt D.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 03:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=31027#comment-21146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I still have the same problem with these new bullets. I don&#039;t know where to send the money!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still have the same problem with these new bullets. I don&#8217;t know where to send the money!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John S</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2011/10/new-berger-105gr-6mm-hybrid-bullets-perform-well/comment-page-1/#comment-21142</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John S]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 01:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=31027#comment-21142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t get it.  All targets are shot at 100 yds.  Those groups can be achieved with a .22 Hornet.  I have no doubt that the bullets perform very well, but a ragged hole in a 100 yd target would never show it.  600 yard groups and corresponding velocities will be the tell all.  Again, I am sure the performance will show up as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get it.  All targets are shot at 100 yds.  Those groups can be achieved with a .22 Hornet.  I have no doubt that the bullets perform very well, but a ragged hole in a 100 yd target would never show it.  600 yard groups and corresponding velocities will be the tell all.  Again, I am sure the performance will show up as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Vander Meulen</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2011/10/new-berger-105gr-6mm-hybrid-bullets-perform-well/comment-page-1/#comment-21141</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Vander Meulen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 00:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=31027#comment-21141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice shooting. My results are close the same but are not the new bullets. Going to try some H4198]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice shooting. My results are close the same but are not the new bullets. Going to try some H4198</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
