<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Caliber Preferences Influenced by Component Costs</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2011/11/caliber-preferences-influenced-by-component-costs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2011/11/caliber-preferences-influenced-by-component-costs/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 15:50:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nic from NZ</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2011/11/caliber-preferences-influenced-by-component-costs/comment-page-1/#comment-23408</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nic from NZ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 08:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=5449#comment-23408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi,
Same for me. I am going the 6.5 Creedmoor way for my &quot;do everything rifle&quot;. Although I still keep my trusty 308 for when the brass becomes rare...

Could you please re edit the post adding the price of the common powders for the different cases: (223, 6mmbr, 6.5x47, 308 and 338 lapua?)
When I used to shoot a 300 win mag at long range in the UK, the powder was definitely among the expensive components of the equation...
Thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
Same for me. I am going the 6.5 Creedmoor way for my &#8220;do everything rifle&#8221;. Although I still keep my trusty 308 for when the brass becomes rare&#8230;</p>
<p>Could you please re edit the post adding the price of the common powders for the different cases: (223, 6mmbr, 6.5&#215;47, 308 and 338 lapua?)<br />
When I used to shoot a 300 win mag at long range in the UK, the powder was definitely among the expensive components of the equation&#8230;<br />
Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benny</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2011/11/caliber-preferences-influenced-by-component-costs/comment-page-1/#comment-23313</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 21:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=5449#comment-23313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been crunching the numbers and pouring over every possible way to save money on shooting targets &amp; deer hunting. Comparing loaded ammo costs as well as components and barrel life and the way Hornady is promoting their 6.5 Creedmoor its a no brainer for me. Ammo for the Hornady A-Max is a hard act to follow. Considering all aspects of the application of my rifles and recoil-barrel life-trajectory ballistics- terminal ballistics etc. I just cant justify any other caliber for my next barrel job on my .243 because of the awesome prices of the 6.5 Creedmoor ammo and Hornady A-Max bullets.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been crunching the numbers and pouring over every possible way to save money on shooting targets &amp; deer hunting. Comparing loaded ammo costs as well as components and barrel life and the way Hornady is promoting their 6.5 Creedmoor its a no brainer for me. Ammo for the Hornady A-Max is a hard act to follow. Considering all aspects of the application of my rifles and recoil-barrel life-trajectory ballistics- terminal ballistics etc. I just cant justify any other caliber for my next barrel job on my .243 because of the awesome prices of the 6.5 Creedmoor ammo and Hornady A-Max bullets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
