<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SHOT Show: Quick Reviews of New-for-2012 Optics</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/01/shot-show-quick-reviews-of-new-for-2012-optics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/01/shot-show-quick-reviews-of-new-for-2012-optics/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 16:26:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/01/shot-show-quick-reviews-of-new-for-2012-optics/comment-page-1/#comment-32401</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 18:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=34050#comment-32401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Vortex Ranger 1000 has the right spec&#039;s to appeal to many hunters but I see the old school flip down eyepiece rubber and wonder why they didn&#039;t use the current twist up eyepiece on most current binoculars?  Also why they selected the 6 power instead of 7 or 8 to bring the spec&#039;s more in line with Swaroski or Leica?  With no units available until summer, I guess we will have to wait and see what the unit is actually capable of but for an eyeglass wearer I would have liked to see the twist up eyepiece and a larger eye relief in the unit.

Thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Vortex Ranger 1000 has the right spec&#8217;s to appeal to many hunters but I see the old school flip down eyepiece rubber and wonder why they didn&#8217;t use the current twist up eyepiece on most current binoculars?  Also why they selected the 6 power instead of 7 or 8 to bring the spec&#8217;s more in line with Swaroski or Leica?  With no units available until summer, I guess we will have to wait and see what the unit is actually capable of but for an eyeglass wearer I would have liked to see the twist up eyepiece and a larger eye relief in the unit.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob L</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/01/shot-show-quick-reviews-of-new-for-2012-optics/comment-page-1/#comment-27791</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bob L]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=34050#comment-27791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Parallax adjustment on the Kales top turret is an excellent idea.  I would have liked to see 8x32 power.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Parallax adjustment on the Kales top turret is an excellent idea.  I would have liked to see 8&#215;32 power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
