<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: .22 LR Ammunition Accuracy &#8212; 55 Ammo Types Tested</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/04/22-lr-ammunition-accuracy-55-types-tested/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/04/22-lr-ammunition-accuracy-55-types-tested/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 15:50:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/04/22-lr-ammunition-accuracy-55-types-tested/comment-page-1/#comment-46485</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 23:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=13579#comment-46485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great test! Would have liked to see just one more added, Fiocchi Standard Velocity, ive had great results with this lower priced ammo.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great test! Would have liked to see just one more added, Fiocchi Standard Velocity, ive had great results with this lower priced ammo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/04/22-lr-ammunition-accuracy-55-types-tested/comment-page-1/#comment-21849</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 08:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=13579#comment-21849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ive never had a round that would shoot smaller groups as the distance increases...it doesn&#039;t make sense to me. Lapua Midas Plus shoots an amazing .164 at 50, then a so-so .535 at 75 but then tightens back up to .510 at 100? How is that?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ive never had a round that would shoot smaller groups as the distance increases&#8230;it doesn&#8217;t make sense to me. Lapua Midas Plus shoots an amazing .164 at 50, then a so-so .535 at 75 but then tightens back up to .510 at 100? How is that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Oates</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/04/22-lr-ammunition-accuracy-55-types-tested/comment-page-1/#comment-16108</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Oates]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 19:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=13579#comment-16108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I appreciate someone going this far out to establish some kind of semblance to all the data collected.......Now the cold towel.......Would my old 513T perform to these standards???? would this be of value to the guy with a Wally world 10-22???? 
Remember what grandpa told you about rifles and each one being a individual just like a woman with specific likes and dislikes even if with consecutive serial numbers or sisters.........]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate someone going this far out to establish some kind of semblance to all the data collected&#8230;&#8230;.Now the cold towel&#8230;&#8230;.Would my old 513T perform to these standards???? would this be of value to the guy with a Wally world 10-22????<br />
Remember what grandpa told you about rifles and each one being a individual just like a woman with specific likes and dislikes even if with consecutive serial numbers or sisters&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/04/22-lr-ammunition-accuracy-55-types-tested/comment-page-1/#comment-16101</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=13579#comment-16101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Doh! Hit the submit button too fast. 

Actually, pix and/or the part numbers off the boxes might be better. ;-)

Thank you for this. It&#039;s a terrific resource.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doh! Hit the submit button too fast. </p>
<p>Actually, pix and/or the part numbers off the boxes might be better. <img src="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt=";-)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
<p>Thank you for this. It&#8217;s a terrific resource.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/04/22-lr-ammunition-accuracy-55-types-tested/comment-page-1/#comment-16100</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=13579#comment-16100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A photo of each box of ammo would be helpful next time &#039;round... makes it easier to figure out which is which.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A photo of each box of ammo would be helpful next time &#8217;round&#8230; makes it easier to figure out which is which.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/04/22-lr-ammunition-accuracy-55-types-tested/comment-page-1/#comment-16099</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 12:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=13579#comment-16099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would have been beneficial for him to record velocity data in this test.Once you get out there, consistent velocity trumps the small variances in group size at closer distance.  It&#039;s no different than shooting a centerfire at long range; velocity deviation = vertical stringing.  You can see it in many of the 100 yard groups...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would have been beneficial for him to record velocity data in this test.Once you get out there, consistent velocity trumps the small variances in group size at closer distance.  It&#8217;s no different than shooting a centerfire at long range; velocity deviation = vertical stringing.  You can see it in many of the 100 yard groups&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RAMS</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/04/22-lr-ammunition-accuracy-55-types-tested/comment-page-1/#comment-15368</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RAMS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=13579#comment-15368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is your estimated OVERALL FTF percent with the ammo tested?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is your estimated OVERALL FTF percent with the ammo tested?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/04/22-lr-ammunition-accuracy-55-types-tested/comment-page-1/#comment-4402</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 04:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=13579#comment-4402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Per this very website, Wolf is relabeled SK:

http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2009/06/sk-rimfire-ammo-rivals-popular-wolf-ammo/

Other websites, and even the Wolf website, seems to confirm this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Per this very website, Wolf is relabeled SK:</p>
<p><a href="http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2009/06/sk-rimfire-ammo-rivals-popular-wolf-ammo/" rel="nofollow">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2009/06/sk-rimfire-ammo-rivals-popular-wolf-ammo/</a></p>
<p>Other websites, and even the Wolf website, seems to confirm this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/04/22-lr-ammunition-accuracy-55-types-tested/comment-page-1/#comment-4401</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 04:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=13579#comment-4401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, I was astounded at how well CCI Mini Mags rated given they are a hunting round.  I have used them for years for rabbits and knew they were good.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I was astounded at how well CCI Mini Mags rated given they are a hunting round.  I have used them for years for rabbits and knew they were good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WTW</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/04/22-lr-ammunition-accuracy-55-types-tested/comment-page-1/#comment-4390</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WTW]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 20:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=13579#comment-4390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I dont know for $3.19 a box of Eley Sport. 
50   :.387
75   :.507
100  :.831
Total:1.719

Doesnt seem bad to me.  But I like to shoot and not break my pocket book.  Looks like the most accurate option for the lowest price.
It would be nice to see an aggregate group size with the average price per box.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont know for $3.19 a box of Eley Sport.<br />
50   :.387<br />
75   :.507<br />
100  :.831<br />
Total:1.719</p>
<p>Doesnt seem bad to me.  But I like to shoot and not break my pocket book.  Looks like the most accurate option for the lowest price.<br />
It would be nice to see an aggregate group size with the average price per box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
