<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 6BR Shines at 500 Yards with PacNor Barrel</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/06/6br-shines-at-500-yards-with-pacnor-barrel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/06/6br-shines-at-500-yards-with-pacnor-barrel/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 15:01:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: P1ZK</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/06/6br-shines-at-500-yards-with-pacnor-barrel/comment-page-1/#comment-41524</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[P1ZK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 19:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=28098#comment-41524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the stock is a handmade stock that was given to me by a very dear friend.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the stock is a handmade stock that was given to me by a very dear friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Koli</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/06/6br-shines-at-500-yards-with-pacnor-barrel/comment-page-1/#comment-36328</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Koli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2012 18:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=28098#comment-36328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is it possible to identify the Make / Model of the Rifle Stock ? Thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it possible to identify the Make / Model of the Rifle Stock ? Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Hurt</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/06/6br-shines-at-500-yards-with-pacnor-barrel/comment-page-1/#comment-36319</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Hurt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 22:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=28098#comment-36319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been using Pacnor exclusively for the  last 4 years (Super match grade 30&quot; 6.5x284 1:9 Polygonal is my favourite)with similar results. Can&#039;t see any reason to change. It certainly shoots better than I can!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using Pacnor exclusively for the  last 4 years (Super match grade 30&#8243; 6.5&#215;284 1:9 Polygonal is my favourite)with similar results. Can&#8217;t see any reason to change. It certainly shoots better than I can!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanner</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/06/6br-shines-at-500-yards-with-pacnor-barrel/comment-page-1/#comment-17785</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tanner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 21:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=28098#comment-17785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for the feedback.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the feedback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AGN jett</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/06/6br-shines-at-500-yards-with-pacnor-barrel/comment-page-1/#comment-17779</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AGN jett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 16:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=28098#comment-17779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would agree. I shoot a very heavy 6.5BPC and while the recoil is negligible it does pop and twist, forcing me to adjust every shot. If I were to compete with a gun like that I would DEFINITELY use a break.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would agree. I shoot a very heavy 6.5BPC and while the recoil is negligible it does pop and twist, forcing me to adjust every shot. If I were to compete with a gun like that I would DEFINITELY use a break.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanner</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/06/6br-shines-at-500-yards-with-pacnor-barrel/comment-page-1/#comment-17761</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tanner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 01:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=28098#comment-17761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wonder why its so trendy to put a muzzle brake on light recoiling guns such as the 6br. It is legal according to the rule book, but unpleasant to share the firing line with.

EDITOR: Tanner, for most shooters, the benefit is reduced pitching, rolling, and jumping on the bags -- more so than reduced force felt on the shoulder. The gun &quot;stays put&quot; better, and this allows the shooter the return the gun to battery more quickly. Guys tell us that, with the brake, they have to do less fiddling to put the cross-hairs back on the target for the subsequent shot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder why its so trendy to put a muzzle brake on light recoiling guns such as the 6br. It is legal according to the rule book, but unpleasant to share the firing line with.</p>
<p>EDITOR: Tanner, for most shooters, the benefit is reduced pitching, rolling, and jumping on the bags &#8212; more so than reduced force felt on the shoulder. The gun &#8220;stays put&#8221; better, and this allows the shooter the return the gun to battery more quickly. Guys tell us that, with the brake, they have to do less fiddling to put the cross-hairs back on the target for the subsequent shot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
