<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Polymer AR15 Lower Receiver from ATI</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/07/new-polymer-ar15-lower-receiver-from-ati/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/07/new-polymer-ar15-lower-receiver-from-ati/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 16:46:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/07/new-polymer-ar15-lower-receiver-from-ati/comment-page-1/#comment-42440</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 20:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=39682#comment-42440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check out this new 80% polymer lower awesome look, quality and pricing, even comes with it&#039;s own machining jig included in the price.
www.jamesmadisontactical.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out this new 80% polymer lower awesome look, quality and pricing, even comes with it&#8217;s own machining jig included in the price.<br />
<a href="http://www.jamesmadisontactical.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.jamesmadisontactical.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Bernhardt</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/07/new-polymer-ar15-lower-receiver-from-ati/comment-page-1/#comment-41374</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Bernhardt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 13:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=39682#comment-41374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been custom building AR15&#039;s for some years now and thought I give these ATI lower polymer&#039;s a try(now that it&#039;s tough to find the Alum one&#039;s), and over all am impressed by them. The quality is very good, they are made of a super tough type polymer, have a very hard surface feel. I wonder if these are made of Makrolon.  Final assembly is on the tight side but this is even stated on the ATI site because it&#039;s better to need to remove a little material to make a better  fit than have a loose fit and no fix. Was even suprised the color is a very good match with the upper color on the Alum material of my PSA&#039;s. So over all suprised and impressed, will buy more if I can find any more.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been custom building AR15&#8217;s for some years now and thought I give these ATI lower polymer&#8217;s a try(now that it&#8217;s tough to find the Alum one&#8217;s), and over all am impressed by them. The quality is very good, they are made of a super tough type polymer, have a very hard surface feel. I wonder if these are made of Makrolon.  Final assembly is on the tight side but this is even stated on the ATI site because it&#8217;s better to need to remove a little material to make a better  fit than have a loose fit and no fix. Was even suprised the color is a very good match with the upper color on the Alum material of my PSA&#8217;s. So over all suprised and impressed, will buy more if I can find any more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/07/new-polymer-ar15-lower-receiver-from-ati/comment-page-1/#comment-40201</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 20:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=39682#comment-40201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know a lot of people don&#039;t like the idea of polymer guns, but if done right, I think their a good a idea.

Look at HK and Glock.  They are some of the most respected companies in the firearm community and they build a lot of their guns out of polymer.  

The HK Mark 23 can withstand some of the harshest torture and shines even though it&#039;s made out polymer.

My dad just bought a NFA LW15 lower and I really like it!  The finish and fit is fantastic.  I&#039;m considering buying one.  If the ATI OMNI is anything like NFA, then I say go for it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know a lot of people don&#8217;t like the idea of polymer guns, but if done right, I think their a good a idea.</p>
<p>Look at HK and Glock.  They are some of the most respected companies in the firearm community and they build a lot of their guns out of polymer.  </p>
<p>The HK Mark 23 can withstand some of the harshest torture and shines even though it&#8217;s made out polymer.</p>
<p>My dad just bought a NFA LW15 lower and I really like it!  The finish and fit is fantastic.  I&#8217;m considering buying one.  If the ATI OMNI is anything like NFA, then I say go for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VisionJinx</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/07/new-polymer-ar15-lower-receiver-from-ati/comment-page-1/#comment-38680</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VisionJinx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 16:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=39682#comment-38680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i have the lw15genII polymer lower withan RGUNS m4 5.56 upper and it is a great gun, i would get one of these anyday over a stamped or milled reciever. people complain about polymer but glock has been doing it for years and nobody calls them cheap... i have put over 6000 rounds through it (all different brands) and this thing still performs like the it did with the first magazine...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have the lw15genII polymer lower withan RGUNS m4 5.56 upper and it is a great gun, i would get one of these anyday over a stamped or milled reciever. people complain about polymer but glock has been doing it for years and nobody calls them cheap&#8230; i have put over 6000 rounds through it (all different brands) and this thing still performs like the it did with the first magazine&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julio</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/07/new-polymer-ar15-lower-receiver-from-ati/comment-page-1/#comment-37275</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 12:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=39682#comment-37275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you like the idea of a cheap, lightweight polymer receiver, you might want to consider New Frontier Armory&#039;s version too (http://www.lw15.com/).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you like the idea of a cheap, lightweight polymer receiver, you might want to consider New Frontier Armory&#8217;s version too (<a href="http://www.lw15.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.lw15.com/</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markm</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/07/new-polymer-ar15-lower-receiver-from-ati/comment-page-1/#comment-37242</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Markm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 12:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=39682#comment-37242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s not point to this.  But people buy this garbage like crazy.  It will sell for sure.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s not point to this.  But people buy this garbage like crazy.  It will sell for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/07/new-polymer-ar15-lower-receiver-from-ati/comment-page-1/#comment-37230</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 03:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=39682#comment-37230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seems too cheap to me, but I guess plastic isn&#039;t as expensive to injection mold as aluminum is to machine.  I wonder if there is any metal reinforced areas to withstand of the the repeatedly moved areas, pins, bolt release and such.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems too cheap to me, but I guess plastic isn&#8217;t as expensive to injection mold as aluminum is to machine.  I wonder if there is any metal reinforced areas to withstand of the the repeatedly moved areas, pins, bolt release and such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Stewart (wvuredneck09)</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/07/new-polymer-ar15-lower-receiver-from-ati/comment-page-1/#comment-37216</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Stewart (wvuredneck09)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 17:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=39682#comment-37216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[very interesting and a great price.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very interesting and a great price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
