This crap about Legally allowed to be is a smokescreen and Romney’s statement Knows this.

They are couching their words believe them and you will pay the price as soon all government buildings will not allow you to carry.

OOOPs they do that now. OK all land is government land sorry turn in your guns.

They work for us, forget that and you wil lose.
We define Right and wrong not them.

“A Sacred Contract: Defense of Marriage

That is why Congressional Republicans took thelead in enacting the Defense of Marriage Act, affirm-ing the right of States and the federal government notto recognize same-sex relationships licensed in other jurisdictions. The current Administration’s open de-fiance of this constitutional principle—in its handlingof immigration cases, in federal personnel benefits,in allowing a same-sex marriage at a military base,and in refusing to defend DOMA in the courts—makes a mockery of the President’s inaugural oath. We commend the United States House of Represen-tatives and State Attorneys General who have de-fended these laws when they have been attacked inthe courts. We reaffirm our support for a Constitu-tional amendment defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman. We applaud the citizens of the majority of States which have enshrined in theirconstitutions the traditional concept of marriage, and we support the campaigns underway in several otherStates to do so.”

VOTE!

To me the key word is “wherever” – IMHO that means in your home, in your car, in public space that has no legal restriction on “civilian” physical presence. Does that mean you have the right to carry into a PTA meeting on a grade school campus? I would understand that if the local law says “no carry” on school property, then you do not have the right. However, if you are on your way to get a haircut on Main Street, in your car or on the sidewalk, yes, right to carry.

There are so many possible situational variations that I suspect it would come down to the nebulous “what a reasonable person would understand”.

I did not post to debate the matter, so please understand in advance that I may not respond in case you think otherwise.

What I do know is that between “second amendment rights” and “marriage between a man and a woman”, Obama MUST be defeated.

My personal problem is that I live in a “winner take all state” which disenfranchises its non-majority citizens every time they vote in a Presidential election. That said, for the first time in my 60+ years, I’m seriously considering putting money behind the candidate I pray will win.

God Bless the United States of America!

What does “has a legal right to be” mean?!
Is that ‘legal right’ controlled by government or the constitution?