<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Remington Rimfire Ammo for $1.25 per 50-rd Box from CMP</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/10/remington-rimfire-ammo-for-1-25-per-50-rd-box-from-cmp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/10/remington-rimfire-ammo-for-1-25-per-50-rd-box-from-cmp/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 11:16:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/10/remington-rimfire-ammo-for-1-25-per-50-rd-box-from-cmp/comment-page-1/#comment-39653</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=42023#comment-39653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It might be worth a try but I haven&#039;t had much luck with Remington .22 ammo pretty much ever. Sure it is great for the occasional semi auto ripping but not much else. If anything odds are this being a bit older that it is probably better than their current offerings. I&#039;d split a case with someone to try at least for the money.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It might be worth a try but I haven&#8217;t had much luck with Remington .22 ammo pretty much ever. Sure it is great for the occasional semi auto ripping but not much else. If anything odds are this being a bit older that it is probably better than their current offerings. I&#8217;d split a case with someone to try at least for the money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fdshuster</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/10/remington-rimfire-ammo-for-1-25-per-50-rd-box-from-cmp/comment-page-1/#comment-39630</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fdshuster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 17:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=42023#comment-39630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my match bullseye competition days, 1960 thru 2005, I tried many times to use Rem. std. velocity. Was always plagued by a massive number of mis-fires. Pulled the bullets dumped the powder &amp; always found the priming mix to be horseshoe shaped, with an area that had no priming. Naturally, that&#039;s where the firing pin hit. Switched to another brand of std. velocity &amp; never had problems.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my match bullseye competition days, 1960 thru 2005, I tried many times to use Rem. std. velocity. Was always plagued by a massive number of mis-fires. Pulled the bullets dumped the powder &amp; always found the priming mix to be horseshoe shaped, with an area that had no priming. Naturally, that&#8217;s where the firing pin hit. Switched to another brand of std. velocity &amp; never had problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/10/remington-rimfire-ammo-for-1-25-per-50-rd-box-from-cmp/comment-page-1/#comment-39629</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 16:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=42023#comment-39629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unless Remington has improved their quality control in the past few years, I would not use this ammo in pistols as it is unreliable, i.e. you will get several duds in a box of 50.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless Remington has improved their quality control in the past few years, I would not use this ammo in pistols as it is unreliable, i.e. you will get several duds in a box of 50.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
