<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Steve Jennings Skeleton F-TR Stock with Integral Bipod</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/11/new-steve-jennings-skeleton-f-tr-stock-with-integral-bipod/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/11/new-steve-jennings-skeleton-f-tr-stock-with-integral-bipod/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 16:26:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/11/new-steve-jennings-skeleton-f-tr-stock-with-integral-bipod/comment-page-1/#comment-50272</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2016 01:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=42846#comment-50272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you do custom stocks for all guns? My Father served in the Gulf wars and was one of the first testers for this skeleton type of butt stock and fell IN LOVE with it. I have a Remington 700 SRS tactical that he really wants that stock on. If you could do it how much would it cost and or do you know a similar style of butt stock that I can put on it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you do custom stocks for all guns? My Father served in the Gulf wars and was one of the first testers for this skeleton type of butt stock and fell IN LOVE with it. I have a Remington 700 SRS tactical that he really wants that stock on. If you could do it how much would it cost and or do you know a similar style of butt stock that I can put on it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave White</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/11/new-steve-jennings-skeleton-f-tr-stock-with-integral-bipod/comment-page-1/#comment-40488</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave White]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 20:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=42846#comment-40488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just noticed a mistake in this article:  &quot;Large metal cylinders at the bottom of the legs provide stability and help resist bipod hop.&quot;

Those feet are Delrin plastic. Hold Center, dw

Dave: Thanks for the correction. Funny I talked to Mark C. a couple days ago and he didn&#039;t mention that. But We&#039;ll fix the story.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just noticed a mistake in this article:  &#8220;Large metal cylinders at the bottom of the legs provide stability and help resist bipod hop.&#8221;</p>
<p>Those feet are Delrin plastic. Hold Center, dw</p>
<p>Dave: Thanks for the correction. Funny I talked to Mark C. a couple days ago and he didn&#8217;t mention that. But We&#8217;ll fix the story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave White</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/11/new-steve-jennings-skeleton-f-tr-stock-with-integral-bipod/comment-page-1/#comment-40413</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave White]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 22:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=42846#comment-40413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a follow up, the stock and bipod weight is approximately 5 pounds.

Note also that Steve Jennings is a race car engine designer with major innovations to endurance racing to his credit.  That is due to his thinking &quot;outside the box.&quot;  His application of that kind of thinking may cause some consternation by a few, but as in racing, it is about winning and innovation takes many forms.  In racing it appears the rules keep getting tighter and tighter to keep up with Steve&#039;s engine designs. Who knows, it might just lead to reduction of the F-Class target to half of what it is now...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a follow up, the stock and bipod weight is approximately 5 pounds.</p>
<p>Note also that Steve Jennings is a race car engine designer with major innovations to endurance racing to his credit.  That is due to his thinking &#8220;outside the box.&#8221;  His application of that kind of thinking may cause some consternation by a few, but as in racing, it is about winning and innovation takes many forms.  In racing it appears the rules keep getting tighter and tighter to keep up with Steve&#8217;s engine designs. Who knows, it might just lead to reduction of the F-Class target to half of what it is now&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave White</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/11/new-steve-jennings-skeleton-f-tr-stock-with-integral-bipod/comment-page-1/#comment-40411</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave White]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 21:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=42846#comment-40411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been shooting one of the early prototypes of this stock for more than a year.  This replaces a $2000 piece of AA Claro with adjustable buttplate, cheek piece, etc.  That is now a safe queen...

With my Barnard P action in .308, topped by a Nightforce NXS 5x22x50, this makes the FT-R weight limit. 

I have about 600 rounds down range with it and have seen performance that I could not get with the palma stock on a Sinclair bipod.  I have shot several five shot groups at 300 yards with all shots in a cloverleaf...  Hopefully, next year will have more 1K range time.

Steve has eliminated the issue of bedding (though my stock was modified to accept the Warner recoil lug), and that steel bar where one would normally expect a cheekpiece is a very critical component with keeping the center of mass as close to the bore centerline as possible.  Shooting very close to free recoil you don&#039;t get your cheek thumped, though I do find a piece of moleskin on that steel is kinder to the skin on a summer day in Utah.

also note that the forward rake of the bipod provides a huge footprint for distribution of mass, and this thing tracks backward like it is on a rail.

As to various comments on asthetics, you could say the same thing about modern art or almost any product design, or building since the days of Mies Van Der Rohe (sp?). However, the Bauhaus theory of form follows function works! I predict this stock will be showing up in the F-Class winner&#039;s circles, and you can take that to the Bank.

Good job, Steve!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been shooting one of the early prototypes of this stock for more than a year.  This replaces a $2000 piece of AA Claro with adjustable buttplate, cheek piece, etc.  That is now a safe queen&#8230;</p>
<p>With my Barnard P action in .308, topped by a Nightforce NXS 5x22x50, this makes the FT-R weight limit. </p>
<p>I have about 600 rounds down range with it and have seen performance that I could not get with the palma stock on a Sinclair bipod.  I have shot several five shot groups at 300 yards with all shots in a cloverleaf&#8230;  Hopefully, next year will have more 1K range time.</p>
<p>Steve has eliminated the issue of bedding (though my stock was modified to accept the Warner recoil lug), and that steel bar where one would normally expect a cheekpiece is a very critical component with keeping the center of mass as close to the bore centerline as possible.  Shooting very close to free recoil you don&#8217;t get your cheek thumped, though I do find a piece of moleskin on that steel is kinder to the skin on a summer day in Utah.</p>
<p>also note that the forward rake of the bipod provides a huge footprint for distribution of mass, and this thing tracks backward like it is on a rail.</p>
<p>As to various comments on asthetics, you could say the same thing about modern art or almost any product design, or building since the days of Mies Van Der Rohe (sp?). However, the Bauhaus theory of form follows function works! I predict this stock will be showing up in the F-Class winner&#8217;s circles, and you can take that to the Bank.</p>
<p>Good job, Steve!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Killshot</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/11/new-steve-jennings-skeleton-f-tr-stock-with-integral-bipod/comment-page-1/#comment-40374</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Killshot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 02:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=42846#comment-40374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jon said &quot;I think F-TR was originally intended to provide a category for more of a “field” rifle, using a “field” bipod.

No, the &quot;F&quot; has nothing to do with Field. If anything it was so Palma shooters who could no longer shoot with irons, sling and a coat could continue to compete.

That rifle perfectly meets the F/TR equipment rules. 

Little practical use? Looks pretty practical to me if winning is your intent.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon said &#8220;I think F-TR was originally intended to provide a category for more of a “field” rifle, using a “field” bipod.</p>
<p>No, the &#8220;F&#8221; has nothing to do with Field. If anything it was so Palma shooters who could no longer shoot with irons, sling and a coat could continue to compete.</p>
<p>That rifle perfectly meets the F/TR equipment rules. </p>
<p>Little practical use? Looks pretty practical to me if winning is your intent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/11/new-steve-jennings-skeleton-f-tr-stock-with-integral-bipod/comment-page-1/#comment-40354</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 19:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=42846#comment-40354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think F-TR wa originally intended to provide a category for more of a &quot;field&quot; rifle, using a &quot;field&quot; bipod.  I think it is safe to say, while competitors with reasonably useful everyday field rifles can certainly still compete, the specialty F-TR rifles and bipods, which have little practical use have taken over the competiton.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think F-TR wa originally intended to provide a category for more of a &#8220;field&#8221; rifle, using a &#8220;field&#8221; bipod.  I think it is safe to say, while competitors with reasonably useful everyday field rifles can certainly still compete, the specialty F-TR rifles and bipods, which have little practical use have taken over the competiton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/11/new-steve-jennings-skeleton-f-tr-stock-with-integral-bipod/comment-page-1/#comment-40324</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 04:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=42846#comment-40324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That is the ugliest thing I have ever seen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is the ugliest thing I have ever seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robert</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/11/new-steve-jennings-skeleton-f-tr-stock-with-integral-bipod/comment-page-1/#comment-40309</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[robert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 18:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=42846#comment-40309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s not gonna win many beauty contests.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not gonna win many beauty contests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/11/new-steve-jennings-skeleton-f-tr-stock-with-integral-bipod/comment-page-1/#comment-40299</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 12:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=42846#comment-40299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, 34&quot; barrel here I come.

This looks like the lightest possible chassis allowing the longest barrels with heavy scopes and still stay inder the weight limit]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, 34&#8243; barrel here I come.</p>
<p>This looks like the lightest possible chassis allowing the longest barrels with heavy scopes and still stay inder the weight limit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikee</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2012/11/new-steve-jennings-skeleton-f-tr-stock-with-integral-bipod/comment-page-1/#comment-40285</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mikee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 07:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=42846#comment-40285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting design. How about a stock for the CG Inch, Remington clone and Quadlite actions. Also a slide on cheek piece instead of just the steel rod might be more comfortable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting design. How about a stock for the CG Inch, Remington clone and Quadlite actions. Also a slide on cheek piece instead of just the steel rod might be more comfortable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
