<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 6mm Dasher Basics &#8212; Bob Hoppe Talks about Loads</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2013/05/6mm-dasher-basics-bob-hoppe-talks-about-loads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2013/05/6mm-dasher-basics-bob-hoppe-talks-about-loads/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 14:59:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Stele</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2013/05/6mm-dasher-basics-bob-hoppe-talks-about-loads/comment-page-1/#comment-61533</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[George Stele]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 15:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=50095#comment-61533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[105 grain bullets at 2970 is essentially identical to 6mm Remington ballistics.  I realize the differences in the cartridge case shape, capacity, yadda yadda. But a 6mm bullet heading downrange at a given velocity does not care what cartridge case and powder charge got it to that point. Of course, there&#039;s the issue of twist rate, and standard 6mm Remington is 1:9. But there&#039;s no reason that a 1:7.5 twist barrel can&#039;t be chambered in 6mm Remington and put on a rifle.  My question is thus: what&#039;s all the fuss about?  What does the Dasher have that makes it special?  That would be interesting to know.

A: Better brass, better efficiency (FPS per powder grain), superior accuracy (demonstrated in 600-yd BR matches), and significantly lower ES/SD , which DOES translate to better accuracy at long range through reduced VERTICAL dispersion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>105 grain bullets at 2970 is essentially identical to 6mm Remington ballistics.  I realize the differences in the cartridge case shape, capacity, yadda yadda. But a 6mm bullet heading downrange at a given velocity does not care what cartridge case and powder charge got it to that point. Of course, there&#8217;s the issue of twist rate, and standard 6mm Remington is 1:9. But there&#8217;s no reason that a 1:7.5 twist barrel can&#8217;t be chambered in 6mm Remington and put on a rifle.  My question is thus: what&#8217;s all the fuss about?  What does the Dasher have that makes it special?  That would be interesting to know.</p>
<p>A: Better brass, better efficiency (FPS per powder grain), superior accuracy (demonstrated in 600-yd BR matches), and significantly lower ES/SD , which DOES translate to better accuracy at long range through reduced VERTICAL dispersion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bernd neidenberger</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2013/05/6mm-dasher-basics-bob-hoppe-talks-about-loads/comment-page-1/#comment-57415</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bernd neidenberger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jul 2019 10:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=50095#comment-57415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hi!
here in germany your website is not available anymore.can you open a mirror site in england maybe?
thank you!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi!<br />
here in germany your website is not available anymore.can you open a mirror site in england maybe?<br />
thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
