<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Large vs. Small Flash Holes in .308 Win Brass</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2013/05/large-vs-small-flash-holes-in-308-win-brass/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2013/05/large-vs-small-flash-holes-in-308-win-brass/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 00:54:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: manny</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2013/05/large-vs-small-flash-holes-in-308-win-brass/comment-page-1/#comment-57114</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[manny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 13:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=49682#comment-57114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[on the contrary small flash hole makes burning slower and that is the benefit, the opposite of writing]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>on the contrary small flash hole makes burning slower and that is the benefit, the opposite of writing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roger harvey</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2013/05/large-vs-small-flash-holes-in-308-win-brass/comment-page-1/#comment-57013</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[roger harvey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2019 16:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=49682#comment-57013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So in theory, the narrow flash hole results in the flash igniting more powder faster than a normal size flash hole does.

Would the result be the same with a faster burning powder and a normal size flash hole?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So in theory, the narrow flash hole results in the flash igniting more powder faster than a normal size flash hole does.</p>
<p>Would the result be the same with a faster burning powder and a normal size flash hole?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene D.</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2013/05/large-vs-small-flash-holes-in-308-win-brass/comment-page-1/#comment-53629</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gene D.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2017 22:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=49682#comment-53629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent read . As the author concludes , there appears to be little to no difference in result , regardless of which primer used . Personally ; I suspect variations in SD / ES have more to do with slight variations in particular loading practices ,simply because of the nature of reloading . Types of powder ; temperature , and altitude could all have more effect on SD and ES than the primer , when comparing the photo&#039;s shown above .

 But the bottom line is still the same . Do what works best in your rifle ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent read . As the author concludes , there appears to be little to no difference in result , regardless of which primer used . Personally ; I suspect variations in SD / ES have more to do with slight variations in particular loading practices ,simply because of the nature of reloading . Types of powder ; temperature , and altitude could all have more effect on SD and ES than the primer , when comparing the photo&#8217;s shown above .</p>
<p> But the bottom line is still the same . Do what works best in your rifle &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert coleman</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2013/05/large-vs-small-flash-holes-in-308-win-brass/comment-page-1/#comment-53622</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert coleman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2017 01:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=49682#comment-53622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I shoot f class. I shot ftr 308 and f open 284 win 6 BR also. Last year I started having pressure problems with the BR. I had to drop 2 full grains in powder to cope with it. What it ended up being was my new dies had the large decapping pin and was enlarging the primer hole. Only after much head scratching did I finally realize the core of the problem. I learned a lot about primers and flash hole size affecting accuracy and pressure. All said I much prefer small hole and primers for accuracy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I shoot f class. I shot ftr 308 and f open 284 win 6 BR also. Last year I started having pressure problems with the BR. I had to drop 2 full grains in powder to cope with it. What it ended up being was my new dies had the large decapping pin and was enlarging the primer hole. Only after much head scratching did I finally realize the core of the problem. I learned a lot about primers and flash hole size affecting accuracy and pressure. All said I much prefer small hole and primers for accuracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2013/05/large-vs-small-flash-holes-in-308-win-brass/comment-page-1/#comment-48174</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 18:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=49682#comment-48174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I use the Lapua Palma .308 brass with a CCI 41 primer for Palma with the 155. Works very well. SD in the single digits. The brass is tough and has a lot of mass in the head. Weighs a average of 172 grams and all has been + or - a gram even from different lots. Makes three nice batches. Lasts forever. Primers are cheaper and easier to get.  It has a PPC type small flash hole so the dies primer pin has to be changed on all .308 dies to deprime and avoid ruining the case. Important point not usually mentioned. A bit of a hassle when you get into collect dies that have to be turned down at the pin and so called universal decappers. Still I wouldn&#039;t go back,,,good stuff.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use the Lapua Palma .308 brass with a CCI 41 primer for Palma with the 155. Works very well. SD in the single digits. The brass is tough and has a lot of mass in the head. Weighs a average of 172 grams and all has been + or &#8211; a gram even from different lots. Makes three nice batches. Lasts forever. Primers are cheaper and easier to get.  It has a PPC type small flash hole so the dies primer pin has to be changed on all .308 dies to deprime and avoid ruining the case. Important point not usually mentioned. A bit of a hassle when you get into collect dies that have to be turned down at the pin and so called universal decappers. Still I wouldn&#8217;t go back,,,good stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arthur o'neill</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2013/05/large-vs-small-flash-holes-in-308-win-brass/comment-page-1/#comment-48172</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[arthur o'neill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 09:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=49682#comment-48172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thank you heaps, i have been thinking about the possible benifits from a larger burn front through a certain size flash hole for some time . primer type /powder type / flash hole size and case diameter .thank you for your article .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you heaps, i have been thinking about the possible benifits from a larger burn front through a certain size flash hole for some time . primer type /powder type / flash hole size and case diameter .thank you for your article .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clark Magnuson</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2013/05/large-vs-small-flash-holes-in-308-win-brass/comment-page-1/#comment-43638</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clark Magnuson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 16:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=49682#comment-43638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have necked down 308 Palma brass to 260 so I could go to higher pressures without loose primer pockets, ala 6mmBR.

The best primer for that is the CCI 450 small magnum rifle primer.

That primer cannot set off   40 gr of CFE behind a 120 gr bullet, but will not set off 42 gr.

What does it all mean?
Small primer pockets are good for high pressure.
Large primers are good for igniting powder.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have necked down 308 Palma brass to 260 so I could go to higher pressures without loose primer pockets, ala 6mmBR.</p>
<p>The best primer for that is the CCI 450 small magnum rifle primer.</p>
<p>That primer cannot set off   40 gr of CFE behind a 120 gr bullet, but will not set off 42 gr.</p>
<p>What does it all mean?<br />
Small primer pockets are good for high pressure.<br />
Large primers are good for igniting powder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: axlenut</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2013/05/large-vs-small-flash-holes-in-308-win-brass/comment-page-1/#comment-42239</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[axlenut]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 10:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=49682#comment-42239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in the 1980&#039;s, before the cartridge&#039;s dimensions were standardized in 1989, I used a batch of .308 brass that was intended to be reformed to the 6mm Remington BR. Remington produced the brass, head stamped, &quot;R-P Rem BR&quot;, that had especially thinned shoulder and body thickness, and used a small rifle primer pocket, although with a .080&quot; flash hole. Formed full length into 7mm IHMSA, loaded with my 140 grain jacketed open point bullet, H-322 powder and a Remington 7-1/2 primer, it was phenomenally accurate in a bolt action Wichita Pistol.

Interesting how old forgotten things become the next great thing decades later. Still, worth experimenting with a few to see what I can come up with.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in the 1980&#8217;s, before the cartridge&#8217;s dimensions were standardized in 1989, I used a batch of .308 brass that was intended to be reformed to the 6mm Remington BR. Remington produced the brass, head stamped, &#8220;R-P Rem BR&#8221;, that had especially thinned shoulder and body thickness, and used a small rifle primer pocket, although with a .080&#8243; flash hole. Formed full length into 7mm IHMSA, loaded with my 140 grain jacketed open point bullet, H-322 powder and a Remington 7-1/2 primer, it was phenomenally accurate in a bolt action Wichita Pistol.</p>
<p>Interesting how old forgotten things become the next great thing decades later. Still, worth experimenting with a few to see what I can come up with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2013/05/large-vs-small-flash-holes-in-308-win-brass/comment-page-1/#comment-42210</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 20:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=49682#comment-42210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What ever happened to German&#039;s web site? Last I heard, he had shoulder surgery and was going to take a break from shooting. That was a couple of years ago. I hope he&#039;s doing well, his articles were very informative.

Tony]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What ever happened to German&#8217;s web site? Last I heard, he had shoulder surgery and was going to take a break from shooting. That was a couple of years ago. I hope he&#8217;s doing well, his articles were very informative.</p>
<p>Tony</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
