Comments on: Video Reviews History of M40 Sniper Rifle

By: Josh

Josh — Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:14:51 +0000

Larry and Benny need to make up and hug ha ha ha

By: Benny

Benny — Wed, 27 Jul 2011 07:47:02 +0000

Larry seems to be emotionally blind to facts and probably has no real world knowledge other than his urban legends. I wonder if Larry will allow me to put dirt and sand exactly where I want to in his AK and in his rem 700 and bet a large sum of money as to whether or not I can make both fail?

By: Larry J. Heintze

Larry J. Heintze — Tue, 26 Jul 2011 22:53:59 +0000

Benny seems to be ignorant to facts of both weapons. Not only will the AK function with debris in it, it does it well. The sloppy fit of parts allow it to function flawlessly. The M-40 is a precision weapon that takes more care for it to function. It is by no means a delicate instrument. You would have to have been there-done that to make an accurate account or testimonial.

By: Benny

Benny — Mon, 25 Jul 2011 07:33:57 +0000

They strayed from the facts-history and started getting all emotional. I hate testimonials about “it was full of mud and it still worked” or “you never have to clean it or worry about it”. We all know this to be false. A weapon is a precision piece of machinery and even an AK (the emotional crowd’s fav weapon) can be stopped cold with a single well placed grain of sand.