<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gear Review: Steiner 8x30mm Military/Marine Binoculars</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2013/10/gear-review-steiner-8x30mm-militarymarine-binoculars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2013/10/gear-review-steiner-8x30mm-militarymarine-binoculars/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 16:26:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clive Conolly</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2013/10/gear-review-steiner-8x30mm-militarymarine-binoculars/comment-page-1/#comment-43262</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clive Conolly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 07:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=26968#comment-43262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When will the Steiner come out with built in range finder? Now you talkin!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When will the Steiner come out with built in range finder? Now you talkin!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2013/10/gear-review-steiner-8x30mm-militarymarine-binoculars/comment-page-1/#comment-43259</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 02:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=26968#comment-43259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My most used binoculars for prairie dogs are a pair of 6x Vortex. Long eye relief, huge filed of view makes them very easy on the eyes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My most used binoculars for prairie dogs are a pair of 6x Vortex. Long eye relief, huge filed of view makes them very easy on the eyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Editor</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2013/10/gear-review-steiner-8x30mm-militarymarine-binoculars/comment-page-1/#comment-34947</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 19:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=26968#comment-34947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hogan: Thanks for your feedback. I didn&#039;t have any fogging problem on a very rainy/ foggy day in the Colorado mountains. But the temp never dropped below about 50 deg and I always had a ball cap. I suspect the Fujinons may have a more advanced lens coating.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hogan: Thanks for your feedback. I didn&#8217;t have any fogging problem on a very rainy/ foggy day in the Colorado mountains. But the temp never dropped below about 50 deg and I always had a ball cap. I suspect the Fujinons may have a more advanced lens coating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hogan</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2013/10/gear-review-steiner-8x30mm-militarymarine-binoculars/comment-page-1/#comment-34917</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hogan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 04:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=26968#comment-34917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Owned a pair of Steiner Military &amp; Marine 8x30s for over 10 years.  Very crisp contrast, great individual focus diopters, compact &amp; rugged.

Unfortunately on several Alaska hunting trips the Steiners would continually fog under wet and rainy conditions.  When I began carrying my Fujinon M22 binos, I never again encounted any fogging.  Too bad the Steiners weren&#039;t up to my needs, their lightweight and armored compactness made them much easier to carry than the full size 7x50 fujinon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Owned a pair of Steiner Military &amp; Marine 8x30s for over 10 years.  Very crisp contrast, great individual focus diopters, compact &amp; rugged.</p>
<p>Unfortunately on several Alaska hunting trips the Steiners would continually fog under wet and rainy conditions.  When I began carrying my Fujinon M22 binos, I never again encounted any fogging.  Too bad the Steiners weren&#8217;t up to my needs, their lightweight and armored compactness made them much easier to carry than the full size 7&#215;50 fujinon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2013/10/gear-review-steiner-8x30mm-militarymarine-binoculars/comment-page-1/#comment-16827</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 22:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=26968#comment-16827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have used a pair of Steiner 8x30 Military/Marine exclusively for the last 14 years. The only knock is being stuck with eight power. I have very different problems with my eyes and slight astigmatism, and I can glass hillsides for hours on end with no eye fatigue. Use a buddy&#039;s Nikon 10x50s more than a few minutes and my eyes are crossed and I begin to get a splitting headache. Same goes for my family member&#039;s Leupold 8 and 10 power binoculars; however, the 8x Leupolds are a distant second. The only other binos I have viewed over much time without eye fatigue that gave BETTER contrast, etc... were $2000+ Ziess. Sooo let&#039;s see $2000!?!  Unless you NEED magnification for positive identification of small details beyond 4-500 yards, I think these are hands down the best binos for the money. (at least that I have viewed!)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have used a pair of Steiner 8&#215;30 Military/Marine exclusively for the last 14 years. The only knock is being stuck with eight power. I have very different problems with my eyes and slight astigmatism, and I can glass hillsides for hours on end with no eye fatigue. Use a buddy&#8217;s Nikon 10x50s more than a few minutes and my eyes are crossed and I begin to get a splitting headache. Same goes for my family member&#8217;s Leupold 8 and 10 power binoculars; however, the 8x Leupolds are a distant second. The only other binos I have viewed over much time without eye fatigue that gave BETTER contrast, etc&#8230; were $2000+ Ziess. Sooo let&#8217;s see $2000!?!  Unless you NEED magnification for positive identification of small details beyond 4-500 yards, I think these are hands down the best binos for the money. (at least that I have viewed!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Harrison</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2013/10/gear-review-steiner-8x30mm-militarymarine-binoculars/comment-page-1/#comment-16826</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony Harrison]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 22:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=26968#comment-16826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just got in from a short varminting session up &#039;til dusk - got a magpie at bit over 230 yards with the 20Tac... Surely everyone uses binoculars when varminting? I can&#039;t imagine trying to spot them using a rifle-mounted scope! I&#039;ve had a set of Steiner 8x56 Hunter binoculars for quite a few years, excellent performers, not up to Zeiss etc but of course they&#039;re much cheaper.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got in from a short varminting session up &#8217;til dusk &#8211; got a magpie at bit over 230 yards with the 20Tac&#8230; Surely everyone uses binoculars when varminting? I can&#8217;t imagine trying to spot them using a rifle-mounted scope! I&#8217;ve had a set of Steiner 8&#215;56 Hunter binoculars for quite a few years, excellent performers, not up to Zeiss etc but of course they&#8217;re much cheaper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
