https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2013/10/u-s-supreme-court-will-decide-firearms-straw-purchaser-case/ from AccurateShooter.com Thu, 21 May 2026 23:59:43 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26 https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2013/10/u-s-supreme-court-will-decide-firearms-straw-purchaser-case/comment-page-1/#comment-43451 Tue, 05 Nov 2013 23:28:58 +0000 http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=53843#comment-43451 Story says it was transferred through an FFL so the original buyer did not need a license. This is in direct conflict with the LE only sale agreement but that is between Glock and officer, not officer and federal government.

]]> https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2013/10/u-s-supreme-court-will-decide-firearms-straw-purchaser-case/comment-page-1/#comment-43351 Wed, 23 Oct 2013 18:00:38 +0000 http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=53843#comment-43351 The only thing I can think of is that the plaintiff is selling a firearm without a license/permit/tax report. Yes, if the purchaser can buy one, then let him buy one without the law enforcement discount. Looks like to me that he is the one that got caught.

]]>