<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Great Review of Straight-Pull Anschutz 1727 by Steven Boelter</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/03/great-review-of-straight-pull-anschutz-1727-by-steven-boelter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/03/great-review-of-straight-pull-anschutz-1727-by-steven-boelter/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 20:22:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikee</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/03/great-review-of-straight-pull-anschutz-1727-by-steven-boelter/comment-page-1/#comment-44426</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mikee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 13:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=54522#comment-44426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marc, you ever tried getting parts for a Blaser LRS 1? For example - try getting a magazine for a 6BR to suit an LRS 1 even though its listed in Blaser sales brochures. Waiting, waiting?? Try getting an 6XC barrel, even thugh its listed in the Blaser sales brochure. How about getting a replacement trigger sear for a Krico 650 from Krico? Where are the competition Sauer, Krico&#039;s etc., on the FTR competition firing points? Why do Remington clones such as Surgeons, Stillers, Kelblys...etc., dominate accuracy competitons? One often touted reason - parts are available for Remingtons and their clones, many of which are interchangeable. What about aftermarket accessories such as stocks, Picatinny rails etc., I agree, these fancy European rifles are engineering marvels, but for that money I can buy an American custom built rifle that is as good as if not better in tolerance levels than a similar European rifle and still have access to excllent factory or aftermarket parts. Am I missing something?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marc, you ever tried getting parts for a Blaser LRS 1? For example &#8211; try getting a magazine for a 6BR to suit an LRS 1 even though its listed in Blaser sales brochures. Waiting, waiting?? Try getting an 6XC barrel, even thugh its listed in the Blaser sales brochure. How about getting a replacement trigger sear for a Krico 650 from Krico? Where are the competition Sauer, Krico&#8217;s etc., on the FTR competition firing points? Why do Remington clones such as Surgeons, Stillers, Kelblys&#8230;etc., dominate accuracy competitons? One often touted reason &#8211; parts are available for Remingtons and their clones, many of which are interchangeable. What about aftermarket accessories such as stocks, Picatinny rails etc., I agree, these fancy European rifles are engineering marvels, but for that money I can buy an American custom built rifle that is as good as if not better in tolerance levels than a similar European rifle and still have access to excllent factory or aftermarket parts. Am I missing something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/03/great-review-of-straight-pull-anschutz-1727-by-steven-boelter/comment-page-1/#comment-44413</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 15:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=54522#comment-44413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[mikee, I have several &quot;over-engineered&quot; firearms which I bought heavily used for a fair price, but they still run circles around new &quot;non over-engineered&quot; competitors without having to replace anything, because durability is part of their &quot;over-engineering.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mikee, I have several &#8220;over-engineered&#8221; firearms which I bought heavily used for a fair price, but they still run circles around new &#8220;non over-engineered&#8221; competitors without having to replace anything, because durability is part of their &#8220;over-engineering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/03/great-review-of-straight-pull-anschutz-1727-by-steven-boelter/comment-page-1/#comment-44409</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2014 21:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=54522#comment-44409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very nice! But as the artical points out to overpriced to be practical.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice! But as the artical points out to overpriced to be practical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daren J</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/03/great-review-of-straight-pull-anschutz-1727-by-steven-boelter/comment-page-1/#comment-44405</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daren J]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2014 14:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=54522#comment-44405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve never shot an Anschutz, but they must be nice for $2000+ 4rd 17HMR rifle.  I&#039;ll stick with my Savage 93 especially since they finally came out with a 10rd mag.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never shot an Anschutz, but they must be nice for $2000+ 4rd 17HMR rifle.  I&#8217;ll stick with my Savage 93 especially since they finally came out with a 10rd mag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikee</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/03/great-review-of-straight-pull-anschutz-1727-by-steven-boelter/comment-page-1/#comment-44401</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mikee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2014 08:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=54522#comment-44401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another example of over engineered German technology for a price. As good as it is, when you need to replace worn parts it is expensive at best or exasperation after sales service. Been there done that!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another example of over engineered German technology for a price. As good as it is, when you need to replace worn parts it is expensive at best or exasperation after sales service. Been there done that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dasher</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/03/great-review-of-straight-pull-anschutz-1727-by-steven-boelter/comment-page-1/#comment-44399</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dasher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2014 22:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=54522#comment-44399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I saw the same action at IWA in the Wood and Alu free rifles as well as the BR model. Nifty cycling action.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw the same action at IWA in the Wood and Alu free rifles as well as the BR model. Nifty cycling action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
