<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEB Invents &#8216;Pod-Pad for Bipod Shooters</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/03/seb-invents-pod-pad-for-bipod-shooters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/03/seb-invents-pod-pad-for-bipod-shooters/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 14:59:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: seb</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/03/seb-invents-pod-pad-for-bipod-shooters/comment-page-1/#comment-44388</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[seb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2014 18:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=54495#comment-44388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gentlemen, 
English is not my main language, so I did read the rules associated carefully before I was starting to design/make the mat.

#1. It is not a board or plate.
Key word: rigid board &#039;vs&#039; flexible.
Anyones can see it is not a board, it can be folded, or rolled if you wish to.

#2. It does not have any guiding means.
I do not make the mat so that the feet slide on any &#039;groove&#039; etc.
I make four divided &#039;compartments&#039; instead of many, to avoid the &quot;guiding means&quot;. You can see that the feet sit-on the center compartment of the mat. I was thinking to make &#039;groove&#039; on the mat to &#039;accept&#039; the feet (it should track better that way) but I know it would be illegal. 

#3. As it is not a board or plate, I do &#039;think&#039; it does NOT HAVE TO meet the 24&quot;x12&quot;x1/2&quot; thick requirement.
Correct me if I&#039;m wrong on this.

#4. My mat does not have any protusions on the bottom &amp; top.
The sand inside would follow the contour of the ground, which make it stable.

#5. I saw various mats used @ the 2013 US Nats &amp; Worlds, from carpet to thick neophrene, or layers/stacked materials which might exceed 1&quot; thick (either to raise the height or to make them heavier, etc) - I did NOT see any problem, DQ, protest, or someone protested.

#6. I did read somewhere in this great forum that you can use mat of any size under your bipod as long as it is not a rigid board/plate. 
And that statement came from some distinguished-great F/TR shooters. I am sure they know &quot;a bit&quot; about F-class shooting/match.

Just my opinion &amp; finding,
seb.

My Thanks to EVERYONES that helped me to create &amp; improve the bipod. Without your helps it won&#039;t be &#039;like this&#039; now!

My special thanks to Paul McMenamin who has been a really good friend and &#039;urged&#039; me to improve/make a better feet. And by the way Paul, I am just an average &#039;Joe&#039; here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gentlemen,<br />
English is not my main language, so I did read the rules associated carefully before I was starting to design/make the mat.</p>
<p>#1. It is not a board or plate.<br />
Key word: rigid board &#8216;vs&#8217; flexible.<br />
Anyones can see it is not a board, it can be folded, or rolled if you wish to.</p>
<p>#2. It does not have any guiding means.<br />
I do not make the mat so that the feet slide on any &#8216;groove&#8217; etc.<br />
I make four divided &#8216;compartments&#8217; instead of many, to avoid the &#8220;guiding means&#8221;. You can see that the feet sit-on the center compartment of the mat. I was thinking to make &#8216;groove&#8217; on the mat to &#8216;accept&#8217; the feet (it should track better that way) but I know it would be illegal. </p>
<p>#3. As it is not a board or plate, I do &#8216;think&#8217; it does NOT HAVE TO meet the 24&#8243;x12&#8243;x1/2&#8243; thick requirement.<br />
Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong on this.</p>
<p>#4. My mat does not have any protusions on the bottom &amp; top.<br />
The sand inside would follow the contour of the ground, which make it stable.</p>
<p>#5. I saw various mats used @ the 2013 US Nats &amp; Worlds, from carpet to thick neophrene, or layers/stacked materials which might exceed 1&#8243; thick (either to raise the height or to make them heavier, etc) &#8211; I did NOT see any problem, DQ, protest, or someone protested.</p>
<p>#6. I did read somewhere in this great forum that you can use mat of any size under your bipod as long as it is not a rigid board/plate.<br />
And that statement came from some distinguished-great F/TR shooters. I am sure they know &#8220;a bit&#8221; about F-class shooting/match.</p>
<p>Just my opinion &amp; finding,<br />
seb.</p>
<p>My Thanks to EVERYONES that helped me to create &amp; improve the bipod. Without your helps it won&#8217;t be &#8216;like this&#8217; now!</p>
<p>My special thanks to Paul McMenamin who has been a really good friend and &#8216;urged&#8217; me to improve/make a better feet. And by the way Paul, I am just an average &#8216;Joe&#8217; here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taildrag15X</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/03/seb-invents-pod-pad-for-bipod-shooters/comment-page-1/#comment-44380</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taildrag15X]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2014 13:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=54495#comment-44380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Guy,

I don&#039;t think it does per the NRA HP Rulebook: 

  3.4.1 Rifle Rests –
(b) F-Class Target Rifle (F-TR) Rests – A bipod and/or sling are the only allowed front supports for
the F-TR rifle. The rifle may be supported by a bipod and/or sling and rear support which provide
no positive mechanical method for returning it to its precise point of aim for the prior shot. Subject
to:
(2) The use of any form of a table is prohibited. Separate flat boards or plates not exceeding the
dimensions of the individual rests by two inches are allowed to be placed under the front
and/or rear rests. In the case of a bipod, the board may not exceed the width of 24” nor depth
of 12” and thickness of 1/2”.

It&#039;s not a &quot;flat board&quot; or &quot;plate&quot; and the thickness is greater than 1/2&quot;.

Not trying to take anything away from Seb he does excellent design work.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guy,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it does per the NRA HP Rulebook: </p>
<p>  3.4.1 Rifle Rests –<br />
(b) F-Class Target Rifle (F-TR) Rests – A bipod and/or sling are the only allowed front supports for<br />
the F-TR rifle. The rifle may be supported by a bipod and/or sling and rear support which provide<br />
no positive mechanical method for returning it to its precise point of aim for the prior shot. Subject<br />
to:<br />
(2) The use of any form of a table is prohibited. Separate flat boards or plates not exceeding the<br />
dimensions of the individual rests by two inches are allowed to be placed under the front<br />
and/or rear rests. In the case of a bipod, the board may not exceed the width of 24” nor depth<br />
of 12” and thickness of 1/2”.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a &#8220;flat board&#8221; or &#8220;plate&#8221; and the thickness is greater than 1/2&#8243;.</p>
<p>Not trying to take anything away from Seb he does excellent design work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/03/seb-invents-pod-pad-for-bipod-shooters/comment-page-1/#comment-44377</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2014 19:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=54495#comment-44377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The big question is is it within F-T/R rules.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The big question is is it within F-T/R rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/03/seb-invents-pod-pad-for-bipod-shooters/comment-page-1/#comment-44373</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2014 23:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=54495#comment-44373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And another SEB product to purchase.  I love these SEB product articles.   It&#039;s never just a &quot;me-to&quot; product with him, always something well thought out and executed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And another SEB product to purchase.  I love these SEB product articles.   It&#8217;s never just a &#8220;me-to&#8221; product with him, always something well thought out and executed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/03/seb-invents-pod-pad-for-bipod-shooters/comment-page-1/#comment-44372</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2014 22:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=54495#comment-44372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the pad is within F-T/R rules, I&#039;d love to get one. I&#039;ve already got one of his bipods on order and can&#039;t wait to try it out.

Seb is consistently thinking outside the box and it is awesome!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the pad is within F-T/R rules, I&#8217;d love to get one. I&#8217;ve already got one of his bipods on order and can&#8217;t wait to try it out.</p>
<p>Seb is consistently thinking outside the box and it is awesome!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
