<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kelbly&#8217;s and GRS Introduce New Low-Profile F-Class Stock</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/05/kelblys-and-grs-introduce-new-low-profile-f-class-stock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/05/kelblys-and-grs-introduce-new-low-profile-f-class-stock/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 20:26:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dasher</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/05/kelblys-and-grs-introduce-new-low-profile-f-class-stock/comment-page-1/#comment-44973</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dasher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2014 20:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=54822#comment-44973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I dont understand the mag either as it&#039;s not allowed to use it during competition.

Also the comb gap doesnt make sense to me, why have it so big?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont understand the mag either as it&#8217;s not allowed to use it during competition.</p>
<p>Also the comb gap doesnt make sense to me, why have it so big?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurz</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/05/kelblys-and-grs-introduce-new-low-profile-f-class-stock/comment-page-1/#comment-44972</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kurz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2014 14:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=54822#comment-44972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You really have to search out the approximate price for this stock. It&#039;s on the GRS website and is listed as 4992 Krone or $837.071 NOT including VAT and shipping. 

I&#039;m sure that they have an established price in conjunction with Kelbly&#039;s but you&#039;d think that Kelbly&#039;s would put it on their website. Maybe Kelbly&#039;s simply wants to get generate attention with contacts to ask about the price? 

Regards.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You really have to search out the approximate price for this stock. It&#8217;s on the GRS website and is listed as 4992 Krone or $837.071 NOT including VAT and shipping. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure that they have an established price in conjunction with Kelbly&#8217;s but you&#8217;d think that Kelbly&#8217;s would put it on their website. Maybe Kelbly&#8217;s simply wants to get generate attention with contacts to ask about the price? </p>
<p>Regards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Comeaux</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/05/kelblys-and-grs-introduce-new-low-profile-f-class-stock/comment-page-1/#comment-44970</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken Comeaux]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2014 14:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=54822#comment-44970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They have it pictured on the Kelbly website, but I couldn&#039;t find any pricing info.  Going to GRS&#039;s site, it is not even shown there.  Wish they would update their sites BEFORE isuing press releases!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have it pictured on the Kelbly website, but I couldn&#8217;t find any pricing info.  Going to GRS&#8217;s site, it is not even shown there.  Wish they would update their sites BEFORE isuing press releases!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/05/kelblys-and-grs-introduce-new-low-profile-f-class-stock/comment-page-1/#comment-44966</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 16:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=54822#comment-44966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t tell for sure if the fore-end is lengthened like the PR&amp;T, Manners, and McMillan F-class stocks, but it doesn&#039;t look like it. I wonder why they didn&#039;t do so, if they were building dedicated F-class stock.

The other question I have is cost. It looks almost &quot;ready to go&quot;, just needs to be bedded (curious as to why it&#039;s shown with a magazine too). If the total cost is hundreds less because you don&#039;t have to pay to have it finished, it might be a good value proposition for a quality stock.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t tell for sure if the fore-end is lengthened like the PR&amp;T, Manners, and McMillan F-class stocks, but it doesn&#8217;t look like it. I wonder why they didn&#8217;t do so, if they were building dedicated F-class stock.</p>
<p>The other question I have is cost. It looks almost &#8220;ready to go&#8221;, just needs to be bedded (curious as to why it&#8217;s shown with a magazine too). If the total cost is hundreds less because you don&#8217;t have to pay to have it finished, it might be a good value proposition for a quality stock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
