<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Muzzle Brake Performance Tests by Bertalotto</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/07/muzzle-brake-performance-tests-by-bertalotto/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/07/muzzle-brake-performance-tests-by-bertalotto/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 14:59:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeC</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/07/muzzle-brake-performance-tests-by-bertalotto/comment-page-1/#comment-45355</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MikeC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2014 21:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=8601#comment-45355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When describing best results with &#039;High-Pressure Cartridges&#039;, I&#039;m sure he mean&#039;t &#039;High muzzle pressure&#039; loads(not cartridges). Big difference.

A competitively loaded 6PPC is a hi-pressure cartridge(way moreso than big boomers), but it presents low muzzle pressures, and would not benefit from a brake.

In-line with this, ANY cartridge with a barrel too short for capacity would be more affected by braking.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When describing best results with &#8216;High-Pressure Cartridges&#8217;, I&#8217;m sure he mean&#8217;t &#8216;High muzzle pressure&#8217; loads(not cartridges). Big difference.</p>
<p>A competitively loaded 6PPC is a hi-pressure cartridge(way moreso than big boomers), but it presents low muzzle pressures, and would not benefit from a brake.</p>
<p>In-line with this, ANY cartridge with a barrel too short for capacity would be more affected by braking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: f d shuster</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/07/muzzle-brake-performance-tests-by-bertalotto/comment-page-1/#comment-45354</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[f d shuster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2014 20:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=8601#comment-45354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve also found that discharge holes around the entire circumference ( have 2 now)did not effect accuracy on a Krieger barreled 308. Same for a Tikka 308.

However with the 3 port, side discharge that I tried on the same Krieger 308, and with identical ammo,it will not shoot! Always had persistant vertical stringing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve also found that discharge holes around the entire circumference ( have 2 now)did not effect accuracy on a Krieger barreled 308. Same for a Tikka 308.</p>
<p>However with the 3 port, side discharge that I tried on the same Krieger 308, and with identical ammo,it will not shoot! Always had persistant vertical stringing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Balding</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/07/muzzle-brake-performance-tests-by-bertalotto/comment-page-1/#comment-42989</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Terry Balding]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 02:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=8601#comment-42989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The muzzle break on my .284 Shehane reduces the recoil to less that my 6 Dasher.  I like them!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The muzzle break on my .284 Shehane reduces the recoil to less that my 6 Dasher.  I like them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikee</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/07/muzzle-brake-performance-tests-by-bertalotto/comment-page-1/#comment-42974</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mikee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Sep 2013 06:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=8601#comment-42974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Muzzle brakes - avoid them if you can! Get a suppressor (if legal) and enjoy the best of both worlds!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Muzzle brakes &#8211; avoid them if you can! Get a suppressor (if legal) and enjoy the best of both worlds!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark223</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/07/muzzle-brake-performance-tests-by-bertalotto/comment-page-1/#comment-42968</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mark223]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Aug 2013 14:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=8601#comment-42968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Muzzle brakes a great for the shooter, especially when shooting off the bench or prone, but definitely not so swell for anyone nearby.  I had a Vais installed on 333 Barnes Supreme (fairly stout recoil) a few years ago and it makes a huge difference in comfort and enjoyment when shooting.  And since it doesn&#039;t affect accuracy or point of impact, I don&#039;t hunt with it (since you generally don&#039;t even notice recoil when shooting at game), which helps when you&#039;re out without hearing protection.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Muzzle brakes a great for the shooter, especially when shooting off the bench or prone, but definitely not so swell for anyone nearby.  I had a Vais installed on 333 Barnes Supreme (fairly stout recoil) a few years ago and it makes a huge difference in comfort and enjoyment when shooting.  And since it doesn&#8217;t affect accuracy or point of impact, I don&#8217;t hunt with it (since you generally don&#8217;t even notice recoil when shooting at game), which helps when you&#8217;re out without hearing protection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/07/muzzle-brake-performance-tests-by-bertalotto/comment-page-1/#comment-32527</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 20:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=8601#comment-32527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have had fairly estensive experience with two big game hunting rifles. Both were using &quot;I think&quot; KDF brakes installed by Bob Sutton about 15-20 years ago. Both were Rem 700&#039;s with factory stocks and Pachmayer Decellator recoil pads. The first was chambered in 340 Wby. It hurt like heck to shoot, so I had Bob install the brake and it was much easier to shoot. The second and my favorite is a &quot;Safari Grade&quot; Rem in .416 Mag. and it&#039;s tolerable to shoot. I&#039;m not saying they don&#039;t kick, but the brake is worth having. Noise for me is a non issue! If I&#039;m at the range I always have hearing protection and in the field I don&#039;t need it unless I&#039;m shooting a lot of rounds, which is something I don&#039;t often do. I think muzzle blast isn&#039;t a big deal for the shooter as it is for others standing or sitting near me. This is only my opinion, but I think they are great! 
Bob]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have had fairly estensive experience with two big game hunting rifles. Both were using &#8220;I think&#8221; KDF brakes installed by Bob Sutton about 15-20 years ago. Both were Rem 700&#8217;s with factory stocks and Pachmayer Decellator recoil pads. The first was chambered in 340 Wby. It hurt like heck to shoot, so I had Bob install the brake and it was much easier to shoot. The second and my favorite is a &#8220;Safari Grade&#8221; Rem in .416 Mag. and it&#8217;s tolerable to shoot. I&#8217;m not saying they don&#8217;t kick, but the brake is worth having. Noise for me is a non issue! If I&#8217;m at the range I always have hearing protection and in the field I don&#8217;t need it unless I&#8217;m shooting a lot of rounds, which is something I don&#8217;t often do. I think muzzle blast isn&#8217;t a big deal for the shooter as it is for others standing or sitting near me. This is only my opinion, but I think they are great!<br />
Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: casspir</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/07/muzzle-brake-performance-tests-by-bertalotto/comment-page-1/#comment-32518</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[casspir]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 14:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=8601#comment-32518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with Dwight and on Safari you might loose your hearing too. Not a good thing when hunting Leopard, Buff or Lion!(LOL)But on a range it is great.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Dwight and on Safari you might loose your hearing too. Not a good thing when hunting Leopard, Buff or Lion!(LOL)But on a range it is great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/07/muzzle-brake-performance-tests-by-bertalotto/comment-page-1/#comment-32517</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Louis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 14:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=8601#comment-32517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had a brake installed on my Ruger M77 .270 and it deffinately reduced the recoil but the muzzle blast is now so fierce that I would not even consider shooting it without ear plugs. That is going to make hunting with it difficult. I will end up taking it off.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a brake installed on my Ruger M77 .270 and it deffinately reduced the recoil but the muzzle blast is now so fierce that I would not even consider shooting it without ear plugs. That is going to make hunting with it difficult. I will end up taking it off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dwight Larson</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/07/muzzle-brake-performance-tests-by-bertalotto/comment-page-1/#comment-2893</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dwight Larson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 20:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=8601#comment-2893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s been my (admittedly limited) experience with muzzle brakes that, what comfort you gain in reduced recoil, you lose to increased muzzle blast.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been my (admittedly limited) experience with muzzle brakes that, what comfort you gain in reduced recoil, you lose to increased muzzle blast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
