<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New KRG 180-Alpha Tactical Chassis for Savage</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/11/new-krg-180-alpha-tactical-chassis-for-savage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/11/new-krg-180-alpha-tactical-chassis-for-savage/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 14:06:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/11/new-krg-180-alpha-tactical-chassis-for-savage/comment-page-1/#comment-46074</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2014 21:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=55614#comment-46074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To me the bigger apples-to-orange is that for whatever reason, a folding stock TRG-22 is double the price of one with a fixed stock, so the better comparison is with a fixed stock TRG-22, which is around $3000.

This new 180-Alpha chassis is fixed-stock only. So a comparable TRG-22 is closer to twice as expensive, not four times more expensive. One plus of this and similar chassis systems is the use of common AICS magazines.

It&#039;s a good option for Savage owners.

Here&#039;s more details from the horse&#039;s mouth:
http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=541&amp;f=5514&amp;t=13430925]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me the bigger apples-to-orange is that for whatever reason, a folding stock TRG-22 is double the price of one with a fixed stock, so the better comparison is with a fixed stock TRG-22, which is around $3000.</p>
<p>This new 180-Alpha chassis is fixed-stock only. So a comparable TRG-22 is closer to twice as expensive, not four times more expensive. One plus of this and similar chassis systems is the use of common AICS magazines.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a good option for Savage owners.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s more details from the horse&#8217;s mouth:<br />
<a href="http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=541&#038;f=5514&#038;t=13430925" rel="nofollow">http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=541&#038;f=5514&#038;t=13430925</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hack</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/11/new-krg-180-alpha-tactical-chassis-for-savage/comment-page-1/#comment-46073</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2014 17:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=55614#comment-46073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had a stock .300WSM Savage Varminter that shot under 1 Moa with me behind the trigger and Hunting Shack ammo. Note, I am not that great! I always wanted to practice more to see how tight I could get the groups. 

Also note, that was not a one time group, the Savage would regularly group under 1 Moa when I did my part. All for $500!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a stock .300WSM Savage Varminter that shot under 1 Moa with me behind the trigger and Hunting Shack ammo. Note, I am not that great! I always wanted to practice more to see how tight I could get the groups. </p>
<p>Also note, that was not a one time group, the Savage would regularly group under 1 Moa when I did my part. All for $500!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Editor</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/11/new-krg-180-alpha-tactical-chassis-for-savage/comment-page-1/#comment-46069</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2014 00:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=55614#comment-46069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re comparison -- Whether it makes sense depends on what factors you are considering. When it comes to pure accuracy, you may be surprised. I&#039;ve owned a TRG-22 in .308. With the factory barrel it was a 0.6-0.7 MOA rifle (at best) when shooting 5-shot groups, with tailored loads. I also have a Savage with a PacNor 6BR barrel, professionally bedded in a custom stock. It is an easy 0.3 MOA rifle. The first measured group out of the gun was in the ones. It has shot six 1/4-MOA groups in a row. It has shot 1.6+&quot; in competition at 600 yards, and the last time we had it out, it produced a 0.2&quot; group at TWO hundred yards (Not 0.2 MOA, rather two-tenths of an inch center to center). And Hot-rodded Savages have won more prizes at big USA varmint shoots than have Sakos.

On the other hand, if one is talking about durability of external finish, and the ability to serve as a combat sniper rifle, then yes, the Sako TRG is better.

But if you are shooting for pink slips based on group size, you might make a mistake picking the TRG over a custom-barreled Savage in a good stock, chambered for a very accurate cartridge.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re comparison &#8212; Whether it makes sense depends on what factors you are considering. When it comes to pure accuracy, you may be surprised. I&#8217;ve owned a TRG-22 in .308. With the factory barrel it was a 0.6-0.7 MOA rifle (at best) when shooting 5-shot groups, with tailored loads. I also have a Savage with a PacNor 6BR barrel, professionally bedded in a custom stock. It is an easy 0.3 MOA rifle. The first measured group out of the gun was in the ones. It has shot six 1/4-MOA groups in a row. It has shot 1.6+&#8221; in competition at 600 yards, and the last time we had it out, it produced a 0.2&#8243; group at TWO hundred yards (Not 0.2 MOA, rather two-tenths of an inch center to center). And Hot-rodded Savages have won more prizes at big USA varmint shoots than have Sakos.</p>
<p>On the other hand, if one is talking about durability of external finish, and the ability to serve as a combat sniper rifle, then yes, the Sako TRG is better.</p>
<p>But if you are shooting for pink slips based on group size, you might make a mistake picking the TRG over a custom-barreled Savage in a good stock, chambered for a very accurate cartridge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Balding</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/11/new-krg-180-alpha-tactical-chassis-for-savage/comment-page-1/#comment-46066</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Terry Balding]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2014 18:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=55614#comment-46066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Could not find it on their website.

Editor: It is new... so new it&#039;s not on the KRG site yet. This was supposed to be &quot;revealed&quot; at Shot Show.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could not find it on their website.</p>
<p>Editor: It is new&#8230; so new it&#8217;s not on the KRG site yet. This was supposed to be &#8220;revealed&#8221; at Shot Show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/11/new-krg-180-alpha-tactical-chassis-for-savage/comment-page-1/#comment-46062</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2014 02:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=55614#comment-46062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yep, the comparison is pretty ridiculous.

The fixed stock version of the TRG looks like a better value than a pimped out Savage.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, the comparison is pretty ridiculous.</p>
<p>The fixed stock version of the TRG looks like a better value than a pimped out Savage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ELR Researcher</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/11/new-krg-180-alpha-tactical-chassis-for-savage/comment-page-1/#comment-46061</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ELR Researcher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2014 21:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=55614#comment-46061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The comparison - apples and watermelons.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The comparison &#8211; apples and watermelons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/11/new-krg-180-alpha-tactical-chassis-for-savage/comment-page-1/#comment-46060</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2014 20:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=55614#comment-46060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very interesting, though at that price I&#039;d doubt it comes with a folding stock. Their Whiskey 3 chassis costs several hundred more for a folding stock, and this looks like a Whiskey 3 adapted for Savages.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting, though at that price I&#8217;d doubt it comes with a folding stock. Their Whiskey 3 chassis costs several hundred more for a folding stock, and this looks like a Whiskey 3 adapted for Savages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
