<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PrecisionRifleBlog.com Tests Range-Finding Binoculars</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/11/precisionrifleblog-com-tests-range-finding-binoculars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/11/precisionrifleblog-com-tests-range-finding-binoculars/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 15:50:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ELR Researcher</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/11/precisionrifleblog-com-tests-range-finding-binoculars/comment-page-1/#comment-46077</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ELR Researcher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2014 00:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=55618#comment-46077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very near the top of the full article,

&quot;The Swarovski EL Range is the only pair of rangefinding binoculars I’m aware of that wasn’t included … but it wasn’t for lack of effort. I talked to Swarovski multiple times trying to convince them to be part of this. I spent hours explaining the comprehensive line-up I’d compiled, and even detailed the field tests I was planning to run through with each pair. I answered every question they asked, and they still declined to be part of it. It’s a shame.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very near the top of the full article,</p>
<p>&#8220;The Swarovski EL Range is the only pair of rangefinding binoculars I’m aware of that wasn’t included … but it wasn’t for lack of effort. I talked to Swarovski multiple times trying to convince them to be part of this. I spent hours explaining the comprehensive line-up I’d compiled, and even detailed the field tests I was planning to run through with each pair. I answered every question they asked, and they still declined to be part of it. It’s a shame.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/11/precisionrifleblog-com-tests-range-finding-binoculars/comment-page-1/#comment-46076</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2014 22:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=55618#comment-46076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If I&#039;m remembering correctly, Cal stated Swarovski declined participation in this test.  What does that say about the performance of the EL range?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I&#8217;m remembering correctly, Cal stated Swarovski declined participation in this test.  What does that say about the performance of the EL range?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/11/precisionrifleblog-com-tests-range-finding-binoculars/comment-page-1/#comment-46072</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2014 17:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=55618#comment-46072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If I remember correctly, Cal said swarovski declined to participate in this test.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I remember correctly, Cal said swarovski declined to participate in this test.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisNZ</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/11/precisionrifleblog-com-tests-range-finding-binoculars/comment-page-1/#comment-46065</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ChrisNZ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2014 17:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=55618#comment-46065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shame the Swarovskis weren&#039;t included. They deserve to be.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shame the Swarovskis weren&#8217;t included. They deserve to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
