Comments on: 2nd Amendment Foundation Challenges I-594 in Washington

By: steve

steve — Fri, 02 Jan 2015 07:26:36 +0000

WHERE is the NRA in this fight????

By: joe

joe — Fri, 02 Jan 2015 03:20:20 +0000

“…reasonable legislation”… Then any “law” which violates the Constitution deemed “reasonable” by a bunch of millionaires, corrupt politicians in cahoots with the controlled media and voted by 27% of the misled populus does not fall under “reasonable legislation”..
If you take the time to educate yourself by reading The Federalist Papers you’ll find out that misinformed population cannot vote the other people rights out like in a democracy.
The system implemented unconstitutional laws by taking advantage of the majority’s ignorance and laziness…

By: MrBill

MrBill — Fri, 02 Jan 2015 02:41:00 +0000

At least SAF is doing something. Where is the NRA?

By: Richard

Richard — Thu, 01 Jan 2015 12:38:47 +0000

The ruling by the SCOTUS states “the States retain the right to reasonable legislation”. As the editor says, it will not be overturned.

By: joe

joe — Thu, 01 Jan 2015 05:39:23 +0000

“The law will not be overturned so don’t get your hopes up…”

It’s amazing how people still put up with these clear violations to the US Constitution..
Unconstitutional “laws” are not laws at all. Educate yourselves people;read the US Constitution, The Federalist papers..
“Shall not be infringed” means exactly what it says.
Are you really so naive to believe that the Framers of the Constitution did not know that “mentally ill” people or criminals exist at that time?

By: Watch out!

Watch out! — Wed, 31 Dec 2014 23:46:09 +0000

It’s similar in Australia were we see new legislation being introduced and no one being able to give us a straight answer as to where we as firearms owners a actually stand.

Basically the act leaves massive areas of gray which allows the officer and court to interpret the rules as they see fit. . . . . . Not a comfortable place to be as a firearm owner!