<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NEW Tipped MatchKing (TMK) Bullets from Sierra</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/12/new-tipped-matchking-tmk-bullets-from-sierra/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/12/new-tipped-matchking-tmk-bullets-from-sierra/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 14:06:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maz</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/12/new-tipped-matchking-tmk-bullets-from-sierra/comment-page-1/#comment-58905</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2020 22:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=55702#comment-58905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regarding use in war, the US ruled JHP to be okay for combat use.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding use in war, the US ruled JHP to be okay for combat use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/12/new-tipped-matchking-tmk-bullets-from-sierra/comment-page-1/#comment-48748</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 16:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=55702#comment-48748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This morning a shooter was using the 175 tipped 30 caliber bullets from his f-class rife at 600 yards. They shot very very well holding half X-ring elevation, no flyers. . He will test them at our 1000 yard practice Monday and ill report back. So far so look&#039;s like a great bullet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This morning a shooter was using the 175 tipped 30 caliber bullets from his f-class rife at 600 yards. They shot very very well holding half X-ring elevation, no flyers. . He will test them at our 1000 yard practice Monday and ill report back. So far so look&#8217;s like a great bullet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/12/new-tipped-matchking-tmk-bullets-from-sierra/comment-page-1/#comment-48747</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 14:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=55702#comment-48747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jim said:“As you seem to be aware, the US is generally considered to play loose with the rules, so anything is possible”

&quot;Generally considered&quot; by whom?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim said:“As you seem to be aware, the US is generally considered to play loose with the rules, so anything is possible”</p>
<p>&#8220;Generally considered&#8221; by whom?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/12/new-tipped-matchking-tmk-bullets-from-sierra/comment-page-1/#comment-48370</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2015 17:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=55702#comment-48370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;As you seem to be aware, the US is generally considered to play loose with the rules, so anything is possible&quot;

That&#039;s because the US didn&#039;t ratify the Hague convention, and the Geneva convention doesn&#039;t apply in this case. as it states &quot;weapons that cause unneccessary suffering&quot; oddly enough, a weapon that kills you faster, causes less suffering than a FMJ that leaves you bleeding out on the ground...

we try to follow the spirit of the convention but military neccessity will prevail.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As you seem to be aware, the US is generally considered to play loose with the rules, so anything is possible&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s because the US didn&#8217;t ratify the Hague convention, and the Geneva convention doesn&#8217;t apply in this case. as it states &#8220;weapons that cause unneccessary suffering&#8221; oddly enough, a weapon that kills you faster, causes less suffering than a FMJ that leaves you bleeding out on the ground&#8230;</p>
<p>we try to follow the spirit of the convention but military neccessity will prevail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/12/new-tipped-matchking-tmk-bullets-from-sierra/comment-page-1/#comment-47770</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2015 06:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=55702#comment-47770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Richard Says &quot;What does this mean for the military contract ammunition given there is not a ruling on plastic tipped bullets under the Geneva and Hague Conventions?&quot;

As you seem to be aware, the US is generally considered to play loose with the rules, so anything is possible.  Nevertheless, I seem to remember that one of the of the &quot;lesser&quot; post WWII agreements declares that bullet components must be clearly visible on x-ray inside a wounded soldier. I am sure that adding metal filings or the like to the plastic  could be used to skirt that one, if the US decides to do so.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard Says &#8220;What does this mean for the military contract ammunition given there is not a ruling on plastic tipped bullets under the Geneva and Hague Conventions?&#8221;</p>
<p>As you seem to be aware, the US is generally considered to play loose with the rules, so anything is possible.  Nevertheless, I seem to remember that one of the of the &#8220;lesser&#8221; post WWII agreements declares that bullet components must be clearly visible on x-ray inside a wounded soldier. I am sure that adding metal filings or the like to the plastic  could be used to skirt that one, if the US decides to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/12/new-tipped-matchking-tmk-bullets-from-sierra/comment-page-1/#comment-46785</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 21:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=55702#comment-46785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new Tipped MatchKing (TMK) bullets are now shipping! For a list of Sierra Bullets dealers near you please visit http://bit.ly/1znV9YF]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new Tipped MatchKing (TMK) bullets are now shipping! For a list of Sierra Bullets dealers near you please visit <a href="http://bit.ly/1znV9YF" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/1znV9YF</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bwagg91</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/12/new-tipped-matchking-tmk-bullets-from-sierra/comment-page-1/#comment-46775</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bwagg91]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 22:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=55702#comment-46775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sooooo how long will i have to wait for the 168 grain 7mm version?????]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sooooo how long will i have to wait for the 168 grain 7mm version?????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RAD175</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/12/new-tipped-matchking-tmk-bullets-from-sierra/comment-page-1/#comment-46635</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RAD175]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2015 23:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=55702#comment-46635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can&#039;t wait to get my hands on and test the new TMKs.  
Hope that Sierra will come out with a TMK version of the 338 250 grain!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t wait to get my hands on and test the new TMKs.<br />
Hope that Sierra will come out with a TMK version of the 338 250 grain!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/12/new-tipped-matchking-tmk-bullets-from-sierra/comment-page-1/#comment-46338</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2015 14:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=55702#comment-46338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[from Otto,

Hello,
The new &quot;Tipped Match King&quot; in the 155 gr. 308&#039;s will be $35.33 for the 100&#039;s and $172.51 for the 500&#039;s
no delivery date as yet, can email you when we know that they are on their way from Sierra.

Regards
ok weber
Happy New Year]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from Otto,</p>
<p>Hello,<br />
The new &#8220;Tipped Match King&#8221; in the 155 gr. 308&#8217;s will be $35.33 for the 100&#8217;s and $172.51 for the 500&#8217;s<br />
no delivery date as yet, can email you when we know that they are on their way from Sierra.</p>
<p>Regards<br />
ok weber<br />
Happy New Year</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Ocab</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/12/new-tipped-matchking-tmk-bullets-from-sierra/comment-page-1/#comment-46332</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Ocab]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2015 17:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=55702#comment-46332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I remember seeing the &quot;22cal 77gr TMK&quot; on the product list at 2014 SHOT Show and when I asked about it, they had to find one guy because no one knew what it was. And from what he told me, it wasn&#039;t even close to release, yet, so I was wondering why the bothered to list it. As an &#039;inactive&#039; Across the Course shooter, I&#039;m eager to try them out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember seeing the &#8220;22cal 77gr TMK&#8221; on the product list at 2014 SHOT Show and when I asked about it, they had to find one guy because no one knew what it was. And from what he told me, it wasn&#8217;t even close to release, yet, so I was wondering why the bothered to list it. As an &#8216;inactive&#8217; Across the Course shooter, I&#8217;m eager to try them out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
