<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Magpul Introduces $259.95 Tactical-Type Stock for Rem 700s</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/01/magpul-introduces-259-95-tactical-type-stock-for-rem-700s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/01/magpul-introduces-259-95-tactical-type-stock-for-rem-700s/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 15:01:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurz</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/01/magpul-introduces-259-95-tactical-type-stock-for-rem-700s/comment-page-1/#comment-46465</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kurz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2015 16:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=55827#comment-46465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[elr,

A check of the manufacturing of the PRS will demonstrate the difference in complexity of the PRS as compared to the injection (I suppose) technology of this stock. Besides, they have to compete with the aluminum chassis of the Bell and Carlson version which can often be found for about $250.00/each in the basic stock.

Regards.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>elr,</p>
<p>A check of the manufacturing of the PRS will demonstrate the difference in complexity of the PRS as compared to the injection (I suppose) technology of this stock. Besides, they have to compete with the aluminum chassis of the Bell and Carlson version which can often be found for about $250.00/each in the basic stock.</p>
<p>Regards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ELR Researcher</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/01/magpul-introduces-259-95-tactical-type-stock-for-rem-700s/comment-page-1/#comment-46462</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ELR Researcher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2015 00:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=55827#comment-46462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The MSRP on a Magpul buttstock ALONE is $255 (http://store.magpul.com/category/181).  Now a complete stock including aluminum bedding block for $259.95 (MSRP)???]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The MSRP on a Magpul buttstock ALONE is $255 (<a href="http://store.magpul.com/category/181" rel="nofollow">http://store.magpul.com/category/181</a>).  Now a complete stock including aluminum bedding block for $259.95 (MSRP)???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitchell</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/01/magpul-introduces-259-95-tactical-type-stock-for-rem-700s/comment-page-1/#comment-46460</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mitchell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2015 23:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=55827#comment-46460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would guess Shot Show, so this week.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would guess Shot Show, so this week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rifle1</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/01/magpul-introduces-259-95-tactical-type-stock-for-rem-700s/comment-page-1/#comment-46459</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rifle1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2015 22:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=55827#comment-46459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That is a hell of an add,.... good marketing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a hell of an add,&#8230;. good marketing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kip Staton</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/01/magpul-introduces-259-95-tactical-type-stock-for-rem-700s/comment-page-1/#comment-46458</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kip Staton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2015 22:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=55827#comment-46458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Should be sometime in the near future!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should be sometime in the near future!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler Vanover</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/01/magpul-introduces-259-95-tactical-type-stock-for-rem-700s/comment-page-1/#comment-46455</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tyler Vanover]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2015 20:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=55827#comment-46455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When is Magpul releasing the stocks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When is Magpul releasing the stocks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
