<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SHOT Show: Featured Optics from Schmidt &amp; Bender</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/01/shot-show-featured-optics-from-schmidt-bender/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/01/shot-show-featured-optics-from-schmidt-bender/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 10:05:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/01/shot-show-featured-optics-from-schmidt-bender/comment-page-1/#comment-46610</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2015 16:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=55921#comment-46610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[3-27x is indeed impressive if it would only be true. The tests on Precision Rifle Blog showed that the scope in question at 27x power actually showed only 22x magnification. This was so outrageous that our importer took one and measured the actual/real magnification... well it definitely was not 27x because he did not want to comment it anymore 
I know it is fancy thesedays to have everything in tan or light dogshit brown, but points are not awarded for looks just for performance. With this price tag, it should be nothing less than perfect...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3-27x is indeed impressive if it would only be true. The tests on Precision Rifle Blog showed that the scope in question at 27x power actually showed only 22x magnification. This was so outrageous that our importer took one and measured the actual/real magnification&#8230; well it definitely was not 27x because he did not want to comment it anymore<br />
I know it is fancy thesedays to have everything in tan or light dogshit brown, but points are not awarded for looks just for performance. With this price tag, it should be nothing less than perfect&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/01/shot-show-featured-optics-from-schmidt-bender/comment-page-1/#comment-46594</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2015 20:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=55921#comment-46594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Was any mention made of the Precision Rifle Blog review and Zant&#039;s comments about the magnification range?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was any mention made of the Precision Rifle Blog review and Zant&#8217;s comments about the magnification range?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/01/shot-show-featured-optics-from-schmidt-bender/comment-page-1/#comment-46593</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2015 19:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=55921#comment-46593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The color on that scope is the most putrid thing I&#039;ve ever seen. Looks like someone mixed butterscotch and mustard; yuck!

On the other hand, the reporter Rachel Kopczyk more than makes up for the scope. What a doll.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The color on that scope is the most putrid thing I&#8217;ve ever seen. Looks like someone mixed butterscotch and mustard; yuck!</p>
<p>On the other hand, the reporter Rachel Kopczyk more than makes up for the scope. What a doll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/01/shot-show-featured-optics-from-schmidt-bender/comment-page-1/#comment-46591</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2015 15:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=55921#comment-46591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[3-27 Impressive range.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3-27 Impressive range.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JabaliHunter</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2015/01/shot-show-featured-optics-from-schmidt-bender/comment-page-1/#comment-46589</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JabaliHunter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2015 12:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=55921#comment-46589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Polar 4-16x50 would be very interesting!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Polar 4-16&#215;50 would be very interesting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
